GOODBYE NAFTA: New North American Trade Agreement Named ‘USMCA’


 Stable Genuis President Donald J.Trump making America Great Again.

That so-called horrible tariffs brought Canada and Mexico to the table to renegotiate the horrible George H.W.Bush and Slick Willie Clinton deal called NAFTA.

Negotiators from the United States and Canada announced a new North American trade agreement over the weekend; officially ending NAFTA and unveiling the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement -better known as the USMCA.

Officials from both countries released a statement Sunday evening ahead of the self-imposed midnight deadline; saying the new free trade agreement will benefit “workers, farmers, ranchers, and businesses” on all sides of the border.

“USMCA will give our workers, farmers, ranchers, and businesses a high-standard trade agreement that will result in freer markets, fairer trade and robust economic growth in our region,” the joint statement said. “It will strengthen the middle class, and create good, well-paying jobs and new opportunities for the nearly half billion people who call North America home.”

Donald J. Trump


Congratulations to Mexico and Canada!

The President weighed-in on the international trade deal Monday morning; saying “Congratulations to Mexico and Canada!”

Nolte: Fox News Cowards Spread Fake News that Christine Blasey Ford Is ‘Credible’

H/T Breitbart’s Big Journalism.

Like John Nolte, I was shocked and dismayed that like fifteen minutes into the lies coming from Christine Balsey Ford’s line of bullshit Fox News contributors were falling all over themselves saying how credible she was.

On Thursday, Judge Andrew Napolitano handed the mob all the rope they could possibly ask for, courtesy of Fox News, saying, “All of us agree that this witness is exceptionally credible.”

No one argued with him.

Listen, I am not here to signal my own virtue. I am not David French, or Matthew Dowd, or Jake Tapper. The reason I have defended those whose politics and character disgust me has nothing to do with virtue and everything to do with self-preservation.

CNN Refuses to Show This Hillary Video. Click Here to Watch
Health Sciences Institute

I have never liked Roy Moore; I have still defended him. Charlie Sheen’s mug shot should be pasted next to “degenerate” in the dictionary; I have still defended him. Woody Allen, George Takei, and Bryan Singer are moral and political illiterates; I have still defended them. And in the specific cases of AllenMoore, and Singer, vigorously and in great detail.

You know what—I was wrong. Let me back up a bit.

It’s actually not about self-preservation, at least not anymore.

Maybe it was at first, maybe it was a hundred years ago, before “The Woke” fascists who have captured our culture and media began slapping scarlet letters on free thinkers; before we became a country where panel after panel on MSNBC and CNN would condemn Atticus Finch for not believing the woman, before Twitter and Facebook would “unperson” Winston Smith over a joke.

Maybe a hundred years ago I believed that if I didn’t join the mob, I would be safe when the mob came for me, because I could say to the mob, “Hey, I’m not a part of this. I said Brian Williams deserved a second chance. I’ve never called on anyone to be fired. I oppose boycotts. I’ve defended you and you and even you.”

How so very naive….

Nope. it is no longer about self-preservation. And again, it not about virtue or principle or pride. It is now only about thing: when the mob comes for me, at the very least, I can comfort myself in the knowledge I am not reaping what I sowed.

And that’s why I waited a week before making any kind of comment about the allegations Christine Blasey Ford leveled against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, and that’s why I listened to her full testimony before commenting on that—which brings me to Fox News.

Watch this crap…

No, no… Wait. Before you watch that crap, let me set the scene…

The Fox News clip below is from Thursday—not Thursday evening after both Dr. Ford and Judge Kavanaugh had their full say, not even Thursday afternoon after Dr. Ford completed her full testimony. No, this is the very first break in her testimony, early in her testimony, very early in her testimony, a mere 15 minutes into her testimony…

And what is on the line here? Forget about the politics or the future of the Supreme Court. … Forget about all of that, because there is something much bigger at stake here: a man, an individual—his name, his reputation, his future, his place in history, his guilt or his innocence, and the way his own children will remember him.

There is no smaller or more vulnerable minority than The Individual, and in a decent country populated with decent people, nothing should be more important than that; than the right of that one man or that one woman to enjoy, among other things, the presumption of innocence until proven otherwise—most especially in the court of public opinion.

And with all that in mind…

Watch this crap:

Your ears are not lying to you. A mere 15 minutes into an all-day event, Chris Wallace, a man who poses as a journalist, the man who hosts one of the oh-so venerated Sunday shows, actually said:

[Ford’s testimony] is extremely emotional, extremely raw, and extremely credible. No could listen to her deliver those words and talk about the assault and the impact it had had on her life and not have your heart go out to her. … This is a disaster for the Republicans.

Later, Woke Wallace dropped this non sequitur of a virtue signal:

Over the course of this week, like I think a lot of American families, my family ― a lot of it on email ― has been discussing this and disagreeing and arguing about it. And two of my daughters have told me stories that I had never heard before about things that happened to them in high school.

Later that same afternoon on NPR CNN MSNBC Fox News:

Judge Andrew Napolitano said, “I think Dr. Ford is exceptionally credible.”

Way to judge, Judge.

Karl Rove described Ford as “credible,” without any pushback.

We expect this kind of shrill, thoughtless, dive bombing from a CNN or MSNBC. In fact, were I to turn on either of those networks to find anything close to moral decency, I wouldn’t know what to do with myself. But here is Fox News—Fox FREAKIN’ News—fashionably proclaiming uncorroborated and unsubstantiated testimony from a woman accusing a fellow human being of an attempted sexual assault—not just as credible, but as “extremely credible” and “exceptionally credible.”

And again, forget the politics, and think only of this: for just a moment pretend you are this man, a man with a wife, parents, friends, daughters—and without a shred of evidence, without even having heard all of her testimony, without having heard the rebuttal testimony, Fox News is telling them the sexual assault allegations against you are “extremely credible.”

This is monstrous behavior, unforgivable, un-American—the stuff of lynch mobs, of quislings—and it is the fakest of fake news.

By any standard of truth, fairness, classical liberalism, evidence, and facts, Dr. Ford is not only not credible, she is nothing close to credible.

Let me count the ways…

  • She has aligned herself with the far-left.
  • She straight-up lied about being afraid to fly.
  • She said she wanted anonymity but continually reached out to the far-left Washington Post.
  • Her polygraph is a farce.
  • Her story has been carefully weaved into a Kafka-esque nightmare no man (even with detailed calendars) can ever escape from.
  • Every single one of her witnesses refutes her story — has no memory of the gathering in question or says it doesn’t happen, and this includes a lifelong friend.
  • Her team was so desperate to have The Woman Who Wants Anonymity to testify publicly, they turned down the opportunity to have her questioned in private at her home in California — and then lied about it.
  • Ford’s therapist’s notes from 2012 also refute here tale, even as the media and Democrats try to gaslight us into believing the opposite. Ford originally claimed four boys tried to rape her when she was in her late teens in the mid-eighties. Now she says it was one rapist and one bystander when she was 15 in the early eighties.
  • Ford refused to give her therapist’s notes to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
  • In the statement she wrote out in her farce of a polygraph test, Ford crossed out “early 80’s” so it would only read “80’s.”
  • Ford told the Committee the “primary impact” of the event occurred during the “four years after” it happened. She goes on to say, “I struggled academically. I struggled very much in Chapel Hill and in College. When I was 17 I went off to college, I had a very hard time.” Note how she skips over two whole years, her junior and senior years in high school; the two school years directly after the attack (unless it did indeed happen in her late teens).
  • To later confirm the event did in fact happen in 1982, Ford told the Committee she was able to pin it down to 1982 because she remembered she did not yet have her drivers’ license. But… she also says she doesn’t remember how she got to or from the house party, so how does she know she didn’t drive herself?
  • Ford also used Mark Judge’s Safeway job to confirm the 1982 timeline. She testified she saw him working there 6-8 weeks after the attack. She could not yet drive, so her mother drove her there, but for some bizarre reason Ford and her mother entered the Safeway using different doors. (And now mom can’t confirm this happened!)
  • Five times during her testimony she mentioned Safeway to verify the date. How could she know such a thing unless it really happened? Well, in his memoir (which began circulating online among Kavanaugh critics in the week before Ford’s testimony) Judge helpfully reveals he was working at the “local supermarket” during the “summer before senior year.”
  • In summation: On top of all four of her own witnesses refuting her allegations against Kavanaugh, so too do the notes taken by her own therapist. (Margot Cleveland’s tweet thread was indispensable for much of this — you will want to readit all.)

Dr. Ford’s allegations are not only not credible — they are ludicrous, a joke…

Even what she does remember is so full of holes you could bounce Brian Stelter through it:

  • She didn’t hear two very drunk and belligerent boys sneak up on her?
  • Why was music already on in a room no one was using?
  • Wouldn’t blasting music ensure someone came upstairs to see what was going on, especially whoever’s house it was? This is completely counter-intuitive to criminal behavior.
  • After she locked herself in the bathroom, her rapists didn’t try to get at her? Didn’t jiggle the doorknob? Didn’t try to claim they were kidding? All tuned up for a rape, they just gave up and went downstairs laughing like nothing happened?
  • She remember how many beers she had (only one), but has been wildly inconsistent on the number of people who attended this small gathering, the number of people who were  in the room where the assault allegedly happened, and by extension the number of boys who tried to rape her.
  • She left without telling her best friend?
  • She left without WARNING her best friend there were two rapists in the house?
  • No one asked why she was leaving or found it strange enough to ask her the following day why she just vanished from the party?
  • She can remember how many beers she had (one) but not whose house she was in, how she got home, the date, the place, how many people were there (sometimes it’s 4, or 5 or 6), or anything solid?
  • She will show the Washington Post her therapist’s note but not the Senate, which represents We the People?

No one who believes in truth can declare this nonsense credible. But beyond that, where is the instinct of human decency that makes it impossible to cruelly and publicly smear a man as having “credible” sexual assault allegation leveled against him when those allegations are the very definition of horse shit.

For God’s sake, what are these Fox News cowards basing the words “credible” on? On something as unreliable as presentation and performance… How many witnesses against the wrongly accused are credible? How about we flip the script and remember that Bill Cosby’s credible presentation and performance as America’s Dad allowed him to serial rape for 50 years.

Or does Fox News actually know just how un-credible Dr. Ford is, but rather than fight for truth, for The Individual, they prefer to surrender to the mob because that’s easier, safer, less stressful, and what you are supposed to do.

A man’s life and career and name and reputation are on the line, his accusers actions and accusations are, by any standard, equal parts deceptive, dishonest, and implausible… And there was Fox News spreading the fake news that 2 + 2 = 5.

P.S. Maybe it’s time for President Trump to step calmly away from the Fox News.

Ford’s Friend At Party Of Alleged Kav Attack Releases Statement On FBI Investigation

H/T Right Wing Folks.

More doubts being cast on Christine Blasey Ford’s story but this story will not see the light of day in the drive-by media.

Christine Blasey Ford accused Brett Kavanaugh, a Supreme Court nominee, of sexual misconduct. Allegedly, Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed and attempted to remove her clothing. Needless to say, Ford’s accusation postponed Kavanaugh’s confirmation vote until the FBI looks into her claims. In the meantime, Ford listed a few witnesses that were allegedly at the party when the incident happened and unfortunately for her, none of those witnesses confirmed her claims as they cannot remember attending such a party.

One of those witnesses is Leland Keyser who happens to be Ford’s close friend. Keyser’s attorney has recently issued a statement, that again indicates she has no recollection of the event whatsoever and that she doesn’t even remember Kavanaugh. Thus, the only evidence Ford provided so was is her testimony before the Senate on Thursday.

On Saturday, Keyser’s attorney, Howard Walsh, said that his client cannot provide any essential information as she has no knowledge of the event taking place.

“Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford,” said Walsh.

“Ms. Keyser asked that I communicate to the committee her willingness to cooperate fully with the FBI’s supplemental investigation of Dr. Christine Ford’s allegation against Judge Brett Kavanaugh,” said Wash in a letter sent to the  Senate Judiciary Committee.

“As my client as already made clear, she does not know Judge Kavanaugh and has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford,” he continued.

This, however, does not mean that Keyser doesn’t believe Ford.

“Notably Mr. Keyser does not refute Dr. Ford’s account, and she has already told the press that she believes Dr. Ford’s account. Her belief in her friend didn’t keep Keyser from conveying that “the simple and unchangeable truth is that she is unable to corroborate it because she has no recollection of the incident in question,” added Walsh.

Shannon Bream


BREAKING: letter to ⁦@senjudiciary⁩ Committee from atty for the female Dr. Ford says was at the 1982 party (Leland Keyser)

Kayser’s statement was issued as a response to the decision made by the Senate that the FBI is to investigate further into the allegations made against Kavanaugh. President Trump was also among those who approved of this decision, although, he set some ground rules.

“I’ve ordered the FBI to conduct a supplemental investigation to update Judge Kavanaugh’s file. As the Senate has requested, this update must be limited in scope and completed in less than one week,” said Trump in a statement.

Sarah Sanders


Statement from President @realDonaldTrump:
“I’ve ordered the FBI to conduct a supplemental investigation to update Judge Kavanaugh’s file. As the Senate has requested, this update must be limited in scope and completed in less than one week.”

Despite the fact that Democrats and Republicans finally found common ground on the matters, it appears that some Republicans still think Democrats took things to another levels as in their opinion, this is more than just an attempt to delay Kavanaugh’s confirmation vote.

Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, called this entire process an orchestrated “charade” and called out his colleges on victimizing both Kavanaugh and Ford.

Identity Of Woman Who Screamed At Flake In Elevator Revealed, Sickening Connections Surface

H/T Right Wing Folks.

There was never any doubt in my mind that Anna Maria Archila was a George Soros stooge.

Ana Maria Archila, who on Friday, shouted at Republican Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona while he was in an elevator, hasn’t stopped voicing her opinion just yet. Maria Gallagher, the other woman in the elevator, along with Archila are now called “heroes”  by many left-wing supporters.

Make the Road Action@MaketheRoadAct

These two heroes, who confronted @JeffFlake this morning, just changed the course of the Kavanaugh process. We❤️you so much, @AnaMariaArchil2 and Maria Gallagher.

Apparently, Archila isn’t simply an everyday woman who vehemently supports the victims of sexual assault. Despite being a skilled activist, she is also a co-executive director of the Center for Popular Democracy, a left-wing organization funded by the liberal billionaire George Soros.

“George Soros is one of the largest funders to the CPD. Soros provided the CPD with $130,000 from the Foundation to Promote Open Society in 2014 and $1,164,500 in 2015. Soros provided an additional $705,000 from the Open Society Policy Center in 2016.” reported The Washington Free Beacon in 2017.

As Flake made his way to the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Friday, after indicating that he will vote to confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, several women confronted him while blocking the elevator door.

“This is not tolerable!” they screamed at him.

“You have children in your family. Think about them! I have two children. I cannot imagine that for the next 50 years they will have to have someone in the Supreme Court who has been accused of violating a young girl. What are you doing, sir?!” Archila yelled at Flake.

When Archila was asked by an aide if she wanted to talk to a staffer, she responded: “No. I want to talk to him. Don’t talk to me.”

Gallagher told Flake that she was a victim of sexual assault and that his decision has personal significance for her.

“I didn’t tell anyone, and you’re telling all women that they don’t matter, that they should just stay quiet because if they tell you what happened to them you are going to ignore them. That’s what happened to me, and that’s what you are telling all women in America, that they don’t matter,” Gallagher said.

“Look at me when I’m talking to you,” she shouted. “You are telling me that my assault doesn’t matter, that what happened to me doesn’t, and that you’re going to let people who do these things into power. That’s what you’re telling me when you vote for him. Don’t look away from me.”

Make the Road Action@MaketheRoadAct

NOW: @AnaMariaArchil2 confronts @JeffFlake before Senate Judiciary Committee. Shares her story of sexual assault and demands an explanation on his statement saying he will vote to confirm Kavanaugh. He refuses to answer. @CPDAction @BeAHeroTeam

Flake listened to what they had to say, occasionally nodded in response and then continued to the hearing, after the women allowed him to pass.

In an interview Friday with The New York Times, Archila said: “I wanted him to feel my rage.”

When Flake’s private meetings with Senate Democrats finished, he told the panel that he would vote to confirm Kavanaugh if an FBI investigation is conducted and the Senate vote is postponed.

Archila believes that his decision to delay the vote is a result to what she said to him.

“His reaction shows the power that we have, together, when we chose to tell our stories and stand up for our vision of an inclusive society. When we take action, we breathe new life and possibility into our democracy,” Archila wrote on Saturday in an Op-Ed for USA Today.

However, it seems that Archila and other protesters weren’t there to support victims of sexual assault only. According to her Op-Ed, Archila had political motives for the confrontation as well.

“Much of his record on civil rights, worker protections, health care and reproductive justice is an abomination. So, too, is his personal history of treating women as less deserving of respect and control over our lives, as these accusations against him have shown,” Archila wrote in her USA Today commentary.

It may not be surprising that she was against Kavanaugh for his politics, but her ties with Soros only contribute to the fact that there are protesters who are paid players.



Sen. Hatch Sends Letter To FBI About ‘Deeply Troubling’ Behavior From Ford’s Lawyers

H/T Right Wing Folks.

I agree with Senator Orrin Hatch(R-UT) Ford’s lawyer Debra Katz is a shady sleaze bag, to say the least.

Orrin Hatch, a Republican Senator for Utah, was one of the people who indicated that Democrats will do everything in their power to postpone Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation vote to the Supreme Court and that they are using Ford’s allegations to do so. Now, he is demanding to be notified if the bureau encounters any stall tactics while the FBI is investigating into the allegations against Kavanaugh.

Hatch also spoke of the “deeply troubling” behavior of one of Ford’s lawyers, Debra Katz.

On Fridays, the Senate Judiciary Committee made a decision, which President Trump backed up, regarding Kavanaugh’s case to allow the FBI to conduct an investigation and look into Ford’s claims, who indicated that Kavanaugh attempted to rape her when they were both in high school. However, the panel also agreed that the investigation is to last only for a week.

Hatch then, sent a letter to the FBI Director Christopher Wray and released a copy of it on his website.

“The President noted that this request should be limited in scope and completed in one week from yesterday,” Hatch wrote.

Hatch also noted that the alleged witnesses and Ford have agreed to cooperate and yet he expressed his concern of possible impedance of the investigation.

“I am writing to request, however, that you notify the White House Counsel’s Office immediately if any witness(es) or their representatives seek to delay or are uncooperative in this process,” he said.

Then, he revealed that the reason behind his concerns is Katz’s apparent conduct.

“One key reason for my concern regarding possible delay comes from testimony during the hearing this past Thursday. According to Dr. Ford, she would have preferred to have been interviewed in California, away from the spectacle of a public hearing. But her lawyers apparently refused to convey to their client numerous offers by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley to conduct a public or private interview in a location of her choosing,” wrote Hatch.

“The lawyers’ refusal led directly to a public hearing, against Dr. Ford’s express wishes. This is deeply troubling,” he continued.

With regard to the investigation, President Trump tweeted on Saturday that even though he limited the length of the investigation to a week, the FBI is allowed to take the investigation wherever it leads them. The initial reports indicated that the FBI are confined to Ford’s claims only.

Donald J. Trump


NBC News incorrectly reported (as usual) that I was limiting the FBI investigation of Judge Kavanaugh, and witnesses, only to certain people. Actually, I want them to interview whoever they deem appropriate, at their discretion. Please correct your reporting!

“NBC News incorrectly reported (as usual) that I was limiting the FBI investigation of Judge Kavanaugh, and witnesses, only to certain people. Actually, I want them to interview whoever they deem appropriate, at their discretion. Please correct your reporting!” Trump tweeted.

Raj Shah, the White House spokesman, confirmed what Trump said in his tweet.

“The scope and duration has been set by the Senate,” Shah said, according to Fox News. “The White House is letting the FBI agents do what they are trained to do.”

On Friday, Hatch said that he doesn’t see a reason for an investigation to be conducted but despite that, he supports the decision as it would make other senators more assured to vote for Kavanaugh after.

Senator Hatch Office


The FBI’s supplemental background investigation will help those with remaining doubts after this week’s hearing.

The limited scope will prevent frivolous accusations like these from creating further unnecessary delay. 

Senate Judiciary


.@senjudiciary today referred potential false statements alleging misconduct by Judge Kavanaugh to federal law enforcement for criminal investigation after accuser recanted. 

View image on Twitter

“While I personally believe it is appropriate to proceed with Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation at this time, I recognize that some members feel that additional investigation could be useful. I support the decision for an investigation limited in length and scope as described today. This will address the concerns raised by Senator Flake and others while also being fair to the Kavanaugh family,” said Hatch in a statement on Friday.

Rosie Gay Shames Graham For Sticking Up For Kavanaugh, ‘F*CK U Closeted Idiot!’

H/T Clash Daily.

Rosie O’Donnell is a half-witted never really was trying for fifteen minutes of fame by running off at her ignorant mouth.

Rosie just went full Rosie. You NEVER want to go ‘full Rosie’. She needs to put down the phone and seek help.

No, really. That’s not even a ‘dig’ at her.

This respose just isn’t rational.

With the passions of the Kavanaugh hearings near their peak, Rosie showed us exactly what kind of irrational whackjobs the other side attracts.

Latest: Rosie Gay Shames Graham For Sticking Up For Kavanaugh, ‘F*CK U Closeted Idiot!’

If their ‘leaders’ play Spartacus on TV, what can we really expect of their followers?

Not only are there large Soros-funded groups of protesters deliberately putting ‘maximum pressure’ on disrupting and derailing the process — including the protesters that flooded the halls of the Senate, and harassed the Senators during the hearings itself, but countless talking heads in the Media(D) and Twitter have been pressing for Americans to kick Due Process to the curb and have emotions drive every decision.

Some of these are the same Antifa-connected shmucks who gathered protesters to drive Ted Cruz and his wife out of a restaurant to pressure them NOT to support Kavanaugh.

So what are the rules of their partisan game? It suddenly ‘OK’ to throw around homosexual slurs?

Or do leftists just get a pass because nobody expects good behavior out of them?

Maybe a better question is this:
Why does Hollywood think about the fact that Rosie thinks accusing someone of being homosexual is an insult? Where’s Dan Savage and his ‘It Get’s Better’ schtick on this one?

This particular dustup goes back to the Avenatti circus, where Senator Lindsey Graham responded to the Creepy Porn Lawyer’s ‘gang rape’ claims that even the Democratic Senators didn’t take seriously enough to question Kavanaugh about during the hearings.

Rosie — of course — read that tweet in the most jaded possible way. It ‘proves’ (in her diseased imagination) that he ‘doesn’t listen’ to victims. He’s the patriarchy, you see. He’s a ‘gay’ idiot, you see.

Did you catch that, everyone? It sounds like she just claimed Gay Men are the Patriarchy.

Maybe she thinks that’s why they don’t date women.

Here it is, in her own words:

Suddenly, it’s ok for Lesbians to utter gay slurs now? That’s kinda weird. It doesn’t sound very ‘inclusive’. Especially if we’re all supposed to believe gender is a social construct.

She’s not the only one throwing out that particular jab, either.

With John McCain’s body barely cold in the ground, Bill Maher went one further on his show, as part of believing Ford unequivocally, and presuming the worst about the man she accused.

Joseph A. Wulfsohn@JosephWulfsohn

Bill Maher Trashes Lindsey Graham For Fiery Kavanaugh Speech: He Needs the ‘Stabilizing Influence of His Dead Boyfriend’ John McCain

Really? Defaming a dead man? That’s so classy.

Roseanne was ‘erased’ not only from her show but from syndication and TV history entirely for statements far less malicious than either of these.

But Rosie will keep her blue check mark because the Left can do no wrong. And Maher didn’t actually ‘insult’ someone. He told a joke. Like Rosanne. Whose career was destroyed.

The term “Double Standards” doesn’t even BEGIN to describe it.

Why does the left so passionately hate a guy who the Right usually writes off as a milquetoast and nondescript ideological ‘squish’?

What suddenly poked the left’ little hornet’s nest of indignation to put HIS name in their mouth?

It probably had something to do with this:

WATCH: Lindsey Graham BLASTS The Democrats Witch Hunt Of Kavanaugh and It’s Awesome!

The Costco-Sized can of whoop-ass he opened up during the hearings.

The saying is, if you’re taking fire, you know you’re over the target.

In that case, Senator, welcome to the ‘war’.

Fox News Fires Contributor over Comments on Kavanaugh Hearing

H/T Right Wing Folks.

I can not find any fault in anything Kevin Jackson had to say.

He sure as Hell got the skank part right look real close at Ford she looks like she has been rode hard and put up wet.


Fox News severed its ties to contributor Kevin Jackson on Thursday after Jackson tweeted a string of vulgar attacks on women making sexual assault allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

During Thursday’s hearing in which both Kavanaugh and accuser Christine Blasey Ford spoke to the Senate Judiciary Committee, Jackson called the women who have accused Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct “lying skanks.”

Fox responded by ending its relationship with him.

“Kevin Jackson has been terminated as a contributor,” Fox said in a statement, according to Time. “His comments on today’s hearings were reprehensible and do not reflect the values of Fox News.”

Kavanaugh has denied three separate accusations of sexual assault from the 1980s when he was in high school and college.

Jackson attacked the accusers in several tweets.

Kevin Jackson@KevinJacksonTBS

I disagree. Feminists are their own worst enemies, and enemy of women.

Also, they want men to NEVER be believed. I’m not succumbing.

TO HELL with the notion that women must be believed no matter what. Lying skanks is what these 3 women are, and we ALL know more 

“Feminists are their own worst enemies, and the enemy of women,” Jackson tweeted. “Also, they want men to NEVER be believed. I’m not succumbing. To HELL with the notion women must be believed no matter what. Lying skanks is what these three women are, and we ALL know more.”

In another tweet, he said, “Leftist women are skanky for the most part. More will be sued and made to pay for their lies.”

One tweet that he later deleted took a very personal shot at Ford.

“#ChristineBlaseyFord academic problems came from her PROMISCUITY! Dang girl, stop opening your legs and OPEN A BOOK!”  he posted, according to Variety.

Other tweets offered his take on the hearing.

Kevin Jackson@KevinJacksonTBS

We get it , you want the Swamp Rat remnant to drum up evidence that doesn’t exist

Kevin Jackson@KevinJacksonTBS

To : “Put yourself in our shoes, Sir”

What Kavanaugh should have said: I can’t FIT in those TINY shoes

Jackson offered no apology, and even after being fired he was taunting those whose feathers he ruffled.

Kevin Jackson@KevinJacksonTBS

It’s funny to watch dismiss but then chide me for getting fired

If Fox sucks, then what did I lose?

“Just so we are clear #Leftists, I stand on my principles even if it costs me a gig You remain lying scum, willing to CRUSH good people for your devilish ideology,” he tweeted Friday.

Kevin Jackson@KevinJacksonTBS


Just letting you know that my time today has arisen to start kicking you in the tail feathers!

Jackson, who hosts a syndicated radio show, he had been a Fox contributor since 2014. He is the author of the book “Race Pimping: The Multi-Trillion Dollar Business of Liberalism.”