DemocRats talk a lot of smack about starting a war in the streets but their words ring hollow.
Let’s look at the facts the left has soy late drinking pajama wearing pajama boys that need safe spaces from words.
The right has lots of well-armed hunters and pissed off armed to the teeth veterans.
Who wins this shoot out?
It’s looking as though Democrats really do want a second bloody civil war in the United States. On Friday, Rep. Mike Levin, D-Calif., threatened street violence if President Trump declares a national emergency over the current border crisis — a crisis greatly exacerbated by the Democrats’ refusal to provide border security.
“If @realDonaldTrump declares a ‘national emergency’ to pay for his border wall, we’ll fight him in Congress, in the courts, and in the streets,” he said on Twitter.
If @realDonaldTrump declares a “national emergency” to pay for his border wall, we’ll fight him in Congress, in the courts, and in the streets.
— Mike Levin (@MikeLevinCA) January 10, 2019
“In the streets…” Let that set in for just a moment and remember that leftists have already proven they have no problem promoting and engaging in street violence to get their way, as we reported here, here, here, here, here, here and in many other articles.
Response was pretty much what you’d expect:
“Fight in the streets?” https://twitter.com/MikeLevinCA/status/1083357225517748224 …
What is it with CA congressman that want to fight and nuke the citizenry
This is a reference to a statement by Rep. Eric Swalwell, who suggested nuking gun owners if they resist gun control.
Another Democrat who wants to disarm us is preaching he will fight in the streets…. cool story bro…. make the move. https://twitter.com/MikeLevinCA/status/1083357225517748224 …
Yet another open call to violence from a leftist https://twitter.com/MikeLevinCA/status/1083357225517748224 …
Perhaps in his dreams… It’s one thing to debate the issue, but to threaten street violence, especially given the left’s demonstrated willingness to engage in such behavior, goes beyond irresponsible and should — at the very least — be cause for censure. That’s unlikely to happen, however, considering who now runs the House of Representatives.
Liberalism, as I’ve repeatedly said since February 2011, continues to show itself to be an ideology of insane, bloodthirsty rage and hate.