New York’s Gruesome, To Term Abortion Bill Now will Allow Actual Baby Parts to be Sold On Black Market

H/T Godfather Politics.

Isaiah 5:20-21 King James Version (KJV)

20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

21 Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo recently signed into law the Reproductive Health Act which basically translates into giving a woman the right to an abortion all the way to term after nixing all the rhetoric included in the bill.

http://fortune.com/2019/01/23/new-yorks-landmark-abortion-rights-bill-protecting-roe-v-wade-decision-now-law/

Many question why Cuomo and NY government officials would actually support such a ghoulish bill in the first place, not to mention be so gleeful at it becoming law. On the surface, it appears that Cuomo and NY government officials went to extremes in supporting women’s rights in allowing for what is essentially any woman’s right to have a “to term” abortion in that state.

In reality, however this law has absolutely nothing to do with women’s rights, or their right to literally kill their babies, but everything to do with the black market sales of fetal and baby parts.

Now that this law has been passed, potentially some additional 300.000 babies will be added to the sales of baby parts via mostly the criminal cartels of South America, Latin America, and Mexico.

This also explains the reasoning behind the US Socialist Left’s desperate push to keep open borders. If the president is allowed to build the wall, it would almost completely stop the black market trade route of various criminal cartels traveling back and forth across the US Mexican border.

The only possible reason behind why so many US so called elected officials need to keep this criminal trade route open is that they have vested interests in every way from personal financial gain to actual participation personally in various crimes these criminal cartels have to offer them. Just perks US elected officials are getting in exchange for allowing free movement of the criminal activity. Physical evidence of financial gain through crime is clearly evident in the personal portfolios of many government officials in Washington, especially in those who have been in office for extended periods of time such as Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Maxine Waters, etc. These politicians have not become multi-millionaires on their government salaries, but did so via their investments in the Pan American Criminal Cartel and their turning a blind eye to the crime trade route at our southern border.

https://freedomoutpost.com/leftist-government-officials-oppose-the-wall-due-to-their-vested-interests-in-organized-crime/

The Pan American Criminal Cartel’s massive web of crimes from human trafficking, drugs, sex trafficking, child abduction for the purpose of international sex slave trade, and now the selling of actual term baby parts, thanks to NY Gov. Cuomo is the reason behind the Leftist push to get Donald Trump out of office.

This vested interest in the free criminal trade via the Mexican border is why the Left was so desperate to keep Trump out of the White House before he was elected, and why they are so desperate to get him out of office now. They knew Donald Trump was a nationalist and would put an end to their personal gravy train that an open borders offer them.

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/petition-repeal-new-yorks-reproductive-health-act-bill-allows-legal-murder-children-birth?fbclid=IwAR1FUQlUvPkvY-jsMFVSgOIKlUtziX6Oyc5hRednWKhXhLBF_kuktmV8dmg

Where is Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg?

Jim Campbell's

Comment by Jim Campbell

January 30th, 2019

Democrats are laboring on the false assumption that they will try to hold on until they can take over the White House following the 2020 elections.

It won’t be the first time they have done so.

Like “Old Mother Hubbard,” who went to the cupboard……….

 

The cupboard on the left is still filled with low life bottom feeders and wannabe hopefuls who will never make it through the nominating process.

She is said to have pneumonia and has been placed in a medically induced coma.(Source)

It’s clear that Democrats don’t want President Trump to nominate a third justice to the Supreme Court.

As expected, the so-called “NEWS,” is doing it’s best to bury the information.

Replacing far-left Ginsburg with another judge who will uphold the constitution will be devastating to the liberal cause to turn the US into a social nightmare…

View original post 516 more words

Frustrated, Disgruntled, and Disgusted…Not

Jim Campbell's

Comment By Jim Campbell

January 30th, 2019

To make sure the reader doesn’t miss any of Jim O’Neill’s offerings it might be a good idea to book mark his reads.

After all that I have done for the Military, our great Veterans, Judges (99), Justices (2), Tax & Regulation Cuts, the Economy, Energy, Trade & MUCH MORE, does anybody really think I won’t build the WALL?

Done more in first two years than any President! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!Trump tweet 1/27/19

Who prophetic were the words of Pink Floyd, below?


By Jim ONeillJanuary 29, 2019

Just remember to smile as you fight for your freedom, because that shows them that they don’t get to win.—Kurt Schlichter “What Will It Take To Make You Understand And Accept That They Hate You?

Last week left me feeling frustrated, disgruntled, and disgusted, and why would it…

View original post 778 more words

Disarming the Defenders- Socialist Politicians Sacrifice our Children in “Gun-Free” Zones

H/T JPFO.

Gun-Free zones are target free zones.

 

By Rob Morse. January 24th, 2019
Original Source

Professor Thomas Sowell said it is dangerous to let people make decisions when they are immune from the consequences. That describes the school board in Baltimore, Maryland as well as other Maryland politicians. Their self-serving political decisions will get out kids hurt and killed. When that happens, these politicians will blame us and demand more political control over our lives. They will probably be re-elected after their policies fail.

I say this because the Baltimore School Board voted unanimously to disarm law enforcement officers on school grounds. That makes the officers easier victims for gang attacks. It leaves all the students at greater risk. It also lets Maryland politicians signal their virtue as they throw hate on cops.

I suspect the school board in Baltimore has already acted like the notorious school board in Parkland, Florida. I suspect they refused to prosecute and remove violent students. I know the Parkland school board ignored sexaul assault and phsical battery as a matter of school policy.

These decisions made the school board look good as statistics showed more thugs graduated from high school. What the stats hid from us was that more students were victimized by unchecked violence in school. We didn’t know that more of the good students left because school wasn’t safe anymore.

We found all this out after a murderer killed 17 students and staff at the high school in Parkland. Now Baltimore is walking it those bloody footprints.

I’m going to unpack the political decisions of the Maryland politicians step by bloody step. What I don’t know is who made the first phone call and set this in motion.

  • We were told that honest citizens should depend on the government for protection just as they depend on the government for food, for shelter, and for education.
  • We’re told we can reduce violence in our schools with more tolerance, more counseling, and more money spent on education. Armed police in school “send the wrong message.”
  • That which gets rewarded gets repeated, so violent crime grows in school and in the larger community.
  • Now we’re told that we should take guns away from law abiding people since crime is rising in Baltimore (and it is).
  • Only politicians and government employees may be armed. Police are now the only ones who can protect you and your family.

Those are big steps towards government control, but nothing moves a political agenda like a good crisis..even if the politicians have to build it themselves. How long until the gangs take over the schools in Baltimore? They already have. It won’t take many more dead students until the Maryland legislature uses dangerous schools as an excuse to impose stricter gun control.

Unfortunately, we are the ones who brought these dangerous politicians to this point. The Maryland legislature imposed strict gun control in 2013. They’ve also increased the restrictions on honest citizens in each succeeding year. I have to add that important modifier, honest citizens, because criminals don’t obey gun laws. No one should be surprised that gun prohibition laws don’t disarm the criminals and the crazies. As you’d expect, violent crime surged in Baltimore as more and more of the victims were disarmed.

What do you call an idea that fails 99 percent of the time? It is called gun control. I pray we don’t have a mass murder in Baltimore schools, but mass murderers want defenseless victims and these politicians served them up on a platter.

I also have to underscore the hypocrisy of the Baltimore School Board and Maryland politicians. The students are left defenseless while the school board has armed guards at their district offices and at school board meetings. The state capital has armed guards protecting the legislators. These government officials demand that men with guns protect them, but not our kids.

An honest police chief would resign or withdraw his officers in protest of disarmed school security officers. That won’t happen since the Baltimore police chief is appointed by the mayor of Baltimore. Elections have consequences and Baltimore brought this on themselves.

When faced with this level of corruption, this disregard for our children’s safety, I’d take my children out of Baltimore public schools. If charged, then demand a jury trial and tell the judge to appoint armed officers to your child’s school before you’ll let your children back in class. Alternatively, you could ask the judge and the court bailiff to go unarmed and show our children that Maryland politicians don’t need guns for protection.

Snort.

Exclusive: Conservatives Unite Against H.R. 1, ‘Ultimate Fantasy of the Left’

H/T Breitbart.

We need to urge our House members to vote No on H.R.1.

That will help only if your House member is a Republican.

My Rep.is the brother of V.P.Mike Pence Greg.

WASHINGTON, DC – Over 150 conservative leaders nationwide released a “Memo to the Movement” from the Conservative Action Project on Monday, declaring that they are opposed to the Democrats’ kick-off legislation H.R. 1, which would profoundly shift elections toward liberal candidates and open the door to rampant voter fraud, calling Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s bill “the ultimate fantasy of the left.”

“Conservatives are united in opposing H.R. 1, the attempt by House Democrats to fundamentally undermine the American electoral system,” the Memo begins.

It explains several key features of Pelosi’s inaugural legislation, outlining how it is designed to ensure that a liberal Democrat wins the White House in 2020 and the Left gains unified control of Congress and well as take over state governments.

The Democrats’ bill violates the First Amendment. It restricts political speech and election activities in several ways that the U.S. Supreme Court has made crystal clear violates the Constitution, such as groups’ pooling resources to take out ads on the issues those groups advocate.

Pelosi’s legislation is a massive federal power grab away from the states. The Constitution gives primary authority to the sovereign states to conduct elections. This bill empowers the federal government to micromanage elections by requiring states to get “preclearance” from Washington, D.C., before changing their election procedures.

H.R. 1 also mandates countless millions of taxpayer dollars be given to candidates for their campaigns, requiring citizens to fund candidates who those citizens actually oppose for office.

The Memo highlights several other features of the bill, including:

  • Forces all states to allow all convicted felons to vote.
  • Requires all states to allow same-day voter registration, which leads to voter fraud.
  • Makes it difficult for a state to discover if a voter is also voting in another state.
  • Prevents states from limiting early voting.
  • Prevents states from limiting voting by mail.
  • Requires all states to provide free mail-in absentee ballots.
  • Criminalizes political speech that the government deems “discouraging” to voters who are statistically more likely to vote Democrat.
  • Takes redistricting away from elected leaders to give to left-leaning commissions.

Many of these items are statistically more likely to increase Democrat and liberal votes over Republican and conservative votes. For example, most felons vote for Democrats, and people who do not register to vote until the last minute lean left as well.

Others increase the odds of voter fraud and intimidation. The most secure method of voting is in a government building on Election Day. Early voting, voting by mail, automatically registering people to vote when they get s driver’s license, and allowing a person to register for the first time on Election Day, are each more susceptible to fraudulent votes or for voters to be intimidated regarding who they should vote for.

Moreover, electioneering messages that are said to “discourage” voting are typically conservative messages that various left-wing minority voter groups attack as “voter suppression.” Making such messages a federal crime creates the possibility of conservative groups being prosecuted by the U.S. government, chilling their willingness to participate in elections at all.

A constellation of 154 national conservative stars signed the Memo to the Movement, including:

Edwin Meese III, former Attorney General of the United States
Alfred Regnery, Chairman, Conservative Action Project
Ken Blackwell, former Ohio Secretary of State and U.S. Ambassador
Jim DeMint, former U.S. Senator and President of the Heritage Foundation
David McIntosh, President, Club for Growth and former Member of Congress
Tony Perkins, President, Family Research Council and Council for National Policy
L. Brett Bozell, III, President, Media Research Center
Ken Cribb, former White House Domestic Policy Advisor to President Reagan
Charles Cooper, former U.S. Assistant Attorney General for Legal Counsel
Bob McEwan, former Member of Congress
Marjorie Dannenfelser, President, Susan B. Anthony List
Tom Fitton, President, Judicial Watch
Matt Schlapp, Chairman, American Conservative Union
Jenny Beth Martin, Chairman, Tea Party Patriots Citizen Fund
Stuart Epperson, Chairman, Salem Media Group
David Bozell, President, For America
Curt Levey, President, Committee for Justice
Hans von Spakovsky, former Commissioner, Federal Election Commission
Susan Carleson, CEO, American Civil Rights Union
Christian Adams, President, Public Interest Legal Foundation
Bill Walton, Chairman, CNP Action
Lt. Gen. Jerry Boykin (ret.), Executive Vice President, Family Research Council
Grover Norquist, President, Americans for Tax Reform
Gary Bauer, President, American Values
James Miller III, former Director, White House Office of Management and Budget
Colin Hanna, President, Let Freedom Ring
Tom McClusky, President, March for Life Action
Myron Ebell, Competitive Enterprise Institute
Gary Marx, President, Madison Strategies
Diana Bannister, President, Shirley & Bannister
Cleta Mitchell, Attorney
Phil Kerpen, President, American Commitment
Sal Russo, Co-Founder, Tea Party Express
Elaine Donnelly, President, Center for Military Readiness
Mario Lopez, President, Hispanic Leadership Fund

  • Read the full Memo here.

The New York Times slimes Virginia Thomas

H/T The Washington Examiner.

The New York Times gives Yellow Journalism a bad name.

From what little I have seen about Virginia Thomas she is a very class act.

There once was a rule of journalistic ethics that a “straight news” reporter refrained from gratuitous labels and judgments pertaining to the subjects of their stories. The New York Times clearly has forgotten those journalistic ethics.

Witness Saturday’s opinion column masquerading as a news report about a meeting Virginia Thomas, wife of Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas, and other conservative activists had with President Trump. The sneering contempt of the reporters for Mrs. Thomas — and their obvious desire to convince the readers that Mrs. Thomas is bad, bad, bad, bad I tell you, BAD! — is like something out of the left-wing the Nation magazine, rather than a major daily newspaper.

Note the words I’ve Italicized in this summary: The lead sentence of the story calls Mrs. Thomas’ group “a delegation of hard-right activists.” The fourth paragraph says that “Ms. Thomas has long been close to what had been the Republican Party’s fringes.” Later, reporters Maggie Haberman and Annie Karni accuse Mrs. Thomas of “promoting conspiracy theories,” and repeatedly report that she has been “criticized” for “inappropriate” potential “conflicts of interest,” “provoking controversy,” and hiring people thought to be racists.

At least the reporters had the courtesy to say what the supposed conspiracy theories were. Both are hardly crazy theories. One was that billionaire “ philanthropist” George Soros was working against Trump. Memo to the Times: He was and is. The other was the “Democrats had committed voter fraud during last year’s midterm elections.” Some of them certainly appeared to do so.

Anyway, throughout the whole story, there is nary a kind word said about Mrs. Thomas, while paragraph after paragraph details her supposed flaws — and those of some of the other conservatives who met with Trump last week.

As a matter of fact, it’s not even clear how hard the Times worked to try to verify its reporting with those not obviously hostile to the conservative activists in the meeting.

The Times reports that Mrs. Thomas herself “did not respond to an email seeking comment,” but did not say whether it tried to get comments from any others brought to the meeting by Mrs. Thomas.

The Times article identifies Mrs. Thomas with regard to her husband’s position and to her own chairmanship of an umbrella group of conservative activists — but does nothing else to describe her as a person of substance in her own right, one who was once a top aide to then-House Majority Leader Dick Armey in the 1990s.

For the liberal media, women are never to be belittled by identifying them primarily as their husband’s wives, unless of course the woman is conservative.

But this is the same Maggie Haberman who blew the original reporting on the Covington Catholic boys at the March for Life, who came close to equating WikiLeaks with the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, who treated Republican concern with obvious shenanigans in Florida vote-counting as “ cold political calculation,” and who in general can be counted on to provide a liberal spin to almost any news story.

Maybe it’s time to describe some of the Times’ news articles as being on the “fringe” of journalism.

Kamala Harris Reveals Socialist Presidential Platform

H/T BarbWire.

This Meme says it better than I ever could.

I found it on Facebook.51352803_1159589500873103_5011765576419246080_n

Kamala Harris has shown herself to be a user and abuser of people.

She used and virtually destroyed Prof. Ford in her attempt to prevent Brett Kavanaugh from being confirmed to the US Supreme Court.

We are now learning that she used former San Francisco Mayor Willie in what can be described as an adulterous affair in order to launch and further her political career.

After serving the US Senate for just over a year, Harris has launched her bid to win the Democratic nomination for president and to defeat Donald Trump in the 2020 election.

I’ve long contended that Harris is a typical California socialist Democrat and now she has confirmed that contention by announcing that she will push for free Medicare for all.

Fox News – Kamala Harris kicks off presidential run slamming Trump policies, pushing ‘Medicare for All’ – Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., formally launched her run for the Democratic presidential nomination Sunday with a full-fledged embrace of big government programs, including “Medicare for All” and universal pre-kindergarten education — and taking multiple shots at President Trump’s policies.

“I’m running to fight for an America where the economy works for working people,” Harris told a cheering crowd outside City Hall in her hometown of Oakland. ” … I am running to declare, once and for all, that health care is a fundamental right, and to deliver that right with ‘Medicare for All.’ To declare education is a fundamental right, and we will guarantee that right with universal pre-K and debt-free college.”

Harris slammed President Trump’s planned border wall as “a medieval vanity project” and criticized the administration for its hardline immigration policy.

“When we have children in cages, crying for their mothers and fathers, don’t you dare call that border security, that’s human rights abuse,” Harris said.,,

Harris, Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and other Democrats are trying to win elections and power with the promise of free Medicare for all.

What they don’t tell the people is that most estimates place the COST of free Medicare for all at around $30 TRILLION over 10 years or $3 TRILLION a year.

Guess who is going to pay for the FREE Medicare for all?

Yep, every tax payer in America will see their federal taxes more than double, along with increased taxes on the wealthy and corporations, which means fewer jobs, less hours and more Americans on unemployment and losing their homes.

This is basic socialism, a government philosophy that believes in enslaving the people and making them rely on the government for all of their needs.

That is a cost much higher than just the financial cost, for their FREE Medicare for all.

READ MORE HERE

 

 

CA Fairground That Banned Gun Shows Now Faces Lawsuit

H/T Bearing Arms.

I hope this lawsuit gets decided in favor of the firearm dealers and Second Amendment advocates.

There’s been a lot of recent unpleasantness regarding gun shows in California. The state has a universal background check law in place, so it can’t reasonably expect the “gun show loophole” crap to fly in its arguments, but it still has done plenty to try and make gun shows a thing of the past.

Now, one site that banned gun shows is finding out the hard way that gun people don’t just roll over.

A group of firearm dealers and Second Amendment advocates is suing a California county fair board, alleging that its decision last year to ban gun shows restricts the Constitutional rights of gun owners.

The lawsuit against the Del Mar Fairgrounds of San Diego County was filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California.

The primary plaintiff is B & L Productions, which claims to be the largest vendor of gun show events in California. It has hosted gun shows at Del Mar Fairgrounds for more than 30 years.

Other plaintiffs include a number of gun show attendees and vendors, who alleged the closure would force them to travel hundreds of miles to attend a similar events. Several Second Amendment advocacy groups, including the California Rifle and Pistol Association, also joined the lawsuit.

“Gun shows have been held at the Del Mar venue for more than 30 years, with no safety issues raised by local law enforcement or the fair board,” the rifle and pistol association said in a statement. “Nonetheless, the Del Mar Fair Board bowed to the political pressure of anti-gun activists and gave in to those board members with particularly strong bias against the tens of thousands of individuals who attend these shows.”

The board put a one-year suspension on gun shows, then seems to want to look at alternatives like gun safety shows or educational events.

They fail to understand that what tends to attract people to gun shows are, well, guns.

Oh, but the board feels perfectly justified in doing this. Why? Because some bad guys got caught trying to circumvent the process.

“We’ve had actually two meetings with DOJ and there have been a number of arrests of felons in the possession here on the fairgrounds,” Board President Steven Shewmaker said in the meeting, according to KPBS. “Sending their wives and girlfriends in to buy ammunition and guns here at the fairgrounds. A number of arrests, in fact, I think he said one particular Saturday — a year or two ago — there was four such arrests in the parking lot. Is that safe? I don’t think so.”

Holy crap on a cracker.

Those are illegal straw purchases and guess what? If they hadn’t had the gun show to go to, they’d have walked into a regular gun store. The difference is that then they probably would have pulled it off.

Gun shows get a lot more attention from law enforcement. There’s a greater need for security. Those arrests only happened because they tried to buy at a gun show, for crying out loud.

The truth is, they were looking for an excuse. They didn’t want guns there, and now they were able to push them out.

Unfortunately for them, gun people aren’t the “roll over and die” sort of people. We fight.

I’m glad to see this lawsuit happen. The anti-gun nitwits need to learn that there are consequences for their actions. They need to start understanding that this is what they’ll face every time they pull this stuff. It needs to become part of their decision-making matrix. “Will there be a lawsuit?” needs to change to, “There will be a lawsuit. Can we afford it?”

Make it hurt.

St. Louis Police Officer Charged In ‘Russian Roulette’ Shooting

H/T Bearing Arms.

My hope is that Officer Nathaniel Hendren gets the maximum penalty under the law for shooting Officer Katlyn Alix.

It is a shame there is not a way to charge him with stupidity.

Some in the media describe the death of Saint Louis police officer Katlyn Alix as an “accident.” They use that term for one simple reason; no one meant to shoot her so far as they can tell.

Still, Alix is dead and a fellow officer pulled the trigger.

More than that, the officer apparently meant to pull the trigger. That’s not an accident, that’s outright negligence because the officers–the very people anti-gunners tell us are the only ones we should trust with guns–broke every rule of gun safety and now a fellow officer is dead.

A St. Louis police officer was charged with manslaughter Friday for allegedly shooting a colleague as the two played Russian roulette, authorities said.

Officer Nathaniel Hendren, 29, shot Officer Katlyn Alix, 24, in his apartment in the city’s Carondelet neighborhood early Thursday in the presence of a third officer, police said.

Hendren was charged with involuntary manslaughter and armed criminal action, police said. If convicted, he faces up to 10 years in prison.

Alix was off duty at the time of the shooting, police said. Hendren and his partner were on duty. All three were in Hendren’s apartment shortly before 1 a.m.

Hendren emptied the cylinder of the revolver and then put one cartridge back in, police said in a probable cause statement. He spun the cylinder, pointed it away and pulled the trigger, but the gun did not fire.

Alix then took the gun, pointed it at Hendren and pulled the trigger without it firing, police said.

Hendren’s partner told Hendren and Alix “that they shouldn’t be playing with guns and that they were police officers,” police said in the statement.

“He felt uncomfortable with them playing with guns and didn’t want to have any part of it and started to leave.”

Hendren took the gun back and pulled the trigger.

The partner had apparently left the room but not the apartment when he heard the gunshot.

Honestly, there’s so much wrong with this it’s not even funny. A lot of the questions are trivial at this point. Right now, the biggest is what kind of moron thinks Russian Roulette is something you should do?

All sorts of people become police officers. Some are hardworking, caring people who want to make their communities safer. Others are folks just looking for a job and don’t care one way or another. Still, others are scumbags who see the badge as a way to get ahead.

And yes, some idiots become police officers.

I look at this and think about the fact that we have an officer accused of killing a fellow officer through a stupid game that anyone with more than three semi-functional brain cells knows not to do, and I’m constantly told that I shouldn’t be trusted with guns, that I should let the police handle all of my safety needs.

I know that officers like this are the exception, not the rule, but those exceptions are always going to exist. Why should I gamble my safety and my family’s safety on the hope that I won’t get an exception on the day I really need it?