Police around the country have routinely been able to cease cars, home, monies for minor infractions of the law.
No indictments, no trial, you look guilty so your personal property now belongs to us, is going to come to a screaming halt. (Source)
In Texas, a public fight has broken out over a strategy used to fight drug crime:
Has been quietly reining in the police and forbidding this practice which in essence turns the police into rogue agents determining on their whims, whose assets are seized and whose aren’t.
I suggest that police departments who liberally applied this practice in the past were breaking the law.
Civil asset forfeiture, which lets police officers seize property from suspected criminals. Opposition to the tactic is uniting two groups who don’t usually get along: lawbreakers, and conservative politicians.
In mid August, 30 squadrons of PT’s were in commission. Nineteen were in the 7th Fleet.
Admiral Kinkaid could not foresee a need for patrol boats around Japan and Korea, so The 7th Fleet boats became the Motor Torpedo Boat Squadrons Philippine Sea Frontier. The shooting was over but there were still jobs where they could be useful.
25-26 August – at Morotai, 16 PT’s under Lt.Comdr. T.R. Stansbury and Gen. Johnson got underway for a rendezvous with the commanders of the Japanese forces on Halmahera. The Japanese commanding general was not there. That was unacceptable.
The following day, BGen. Warren McNaught went with 6 PT boats and this time Lt.Gen. Ishii and Capt. Fujita, IJN commander were waiting. The boats carried them to the 93rd Div. headquarters on Morotai. It was here that they surrendered 37,000 troops, 4,000 Japanese civilians and a very large quantity of equipment. This was…
I have heard bits and pieces of the Bettle Bailey story.
As Paul Harvey used to say “Now You KnowThe Rest Of The Story.’
Griffin solemnly explained her father never realized he was the inspiration for the character that became Sgt. Snorkel.
A rather portly and occasionally grouchy Sgt. Orville P. Snorkel has, for decades, tried to instill some discipline into the easygoing Beetle Bailey.
Few realize that the relationship revealed in the comic strip between Beetle and Sarge is a direct reflection of the association between the strip’s creator, Mort Walker, and a sergeant he encountered in St. Louis during World War II.
Octavian N. Savu was born in 1914 in Indiana to parents who immigrated to the United States from Romania. At a very young age, the family moved to St. Joseph, Missouri, where Savu grew into adulthood.
“His mom took him to school when he was very young and when the teacher asked him what his name was, he said ‘Tavie,’” explained Savu’s oldest daughter, Rena Griffin. “The teacher thought he said ‘Tommie’ and that was his name ever since—Tom or Tommie.”
According to his obituary, Savu went on to pursue post-high school education at St. Joseph Junior College, Park College, and the University of Missouri.
In 1935, the 21-year-old decided to embark upon what would become a decade-long military journey by enlisting in the U.S. Army at Ft. Leavenworth, Kansas, receiving an assignment to the 17th Infantry.
Five years into his enlistment, he married his fiancee, Margo. He quickly ascended through the enlisted ranks and, in the early 1940s, became an instructor with the Reserve Officer Training Corps program at Abraham Lincoln High School in Council Bluffs, Iowa.
During his time there, he provided training to the students in first-aid, combat tactics, marksmanship, and map reading.
In 1943, Washington University in St. Louis became Savu’s next assignment, where he oversaw soldiers in the school’s Army Specialized Training Program.
The program was renamed the Engineering, Science, and Management War Training program. It ran from 1943-1945, offering 12-week courses to active duty service members with a focus in such fields as foreign language and engineering.
It was while he was at Washington University that Sgt. Savu met Mort Walker of Kansas City, a World War II draftee who would later memorialize him through a widely syndicated comic strip.
“Sgt. Snorkel comes from real life, too,” wrote Mort Walker in his 1975 book Backstage at the Strips.
Although occasionally a firm disciplinarian, Walker noted in a 2017 interview, “I remember there was a time that the sergeant wrote all of us [soldiers] a poem titled My Boys and placed it on each of our pillows. That’s when we realized that this man had a heart and we weren’t mad at him anymore.”
Walker, who was already a recognized artist prior to his induction in the U.S. Army, drew a caricature of Octavian Savu before the two parted ways in St. Louis in 1944, not realizing at the time that his former sergeant would inspire a beloved cartoon character a few years later.
Discharge papers reveal that Savu, who achieved the rank of first sergeant, was deployed overseas from April to August 1945, serving as an administrative sergeant with the 14th Reinforcement Depot in Thionville, France.
“I know that my father had a service-connected disability and came home from France early,” said Griffin. “He had cardiovascular disease and was later diagnosed with diabetes.”
Discharged for reasons of disability on September 21, 1945, with a little more than ten years of military service, Savu and his wife eventually relocated to Colorado after adopting Griffin and her younger sister.
“We lived in Denver at first and later moved to Aurora,” Griffin explained. “My father found a job as a financial systems specialist with the Air Force Accounting and Finance Center.”
Griffin recalls that, when she and her sister were very young, her father had a heart attack. After that, he took up gardening and grew “the most beautiful roses and lawn in the neighborhood.” She added that he remained active in the community and served as commander of his local Veterans of Foreign Wars post.
In April 1968, Savu loaded the family in a car and headed east to visit the community of his youth. During the trip, he showed his children the home in which he grew up in St. Joseph as well as the schools he had attended. He then took his family north to visit a family friend in Council Bluffs, Iowa.
“On the way back to Denver, we stopped at a hotel in Omaha,” said Griffin. “My dad had his third heart attack and died in that hotel. I was fourteen at the time, and my sister was eleven.” With a somber pause, she added, “He had taken great pleasure in showing us all of those places and really loved Missouri.”
The 54-year-old Savu was laid to rest with full military honors in the Fort Logan National Cemetery in Denver.
Although Mort Walker drew a caricature of her father while they were stationed together in St. Louis during World War II, Griffin solemnly explained her father never realized he was the inspiration for the character that became Sgt. Snorkel.
“He never said anything about it, and I don’t believe he communicated with Mort Walker before he passed away in 1968,” Griffin said. (Mort Walker himself passed away on January 28, 2018.) “My sister and I didn’t even know about the connection between dad and Beetle Bailey until recently.”
She acknowledges her father possessed many of the bold characteristics portrayed in the Beetle Bailey comic strip even though some may have been exaggerated for comedic effect, but Griffin affirms the real Sgt. Savu was a man full of character and compassion.
“While he was tough, he was fair, and I think that’s why his troops loved him so much,” she said. “He was my mentor as well as my father, and some of my best memories are of him.”
Jeremy P. Ämick writes on behalf of the Silver Star Families of America.
I have heard these urban legends about statues of horse and riders.
Indeed, General Sheridan was wounded during the Civil War, but did not die in battle
The depiction of wartime heroes, royalty, and similar important figures in the form of equestrian statues dates back to the sixth century BC. The Rampin Rider statue from ancient Greece is the oldest known piece of equestrian statuary in the West
The symbolism of equestrian statues is a rather interesting subject, with some people opining that the depiction of the horse’s feet gives a hint about the rider’s fate.
Particularly in the United States, the urban legend goes thus:
If the horse has one hoof in the air, then the rider was wounded in battle—and may have died later from the wounds.
If the horse has both hooves in the air, then the rider was killed in battle.
If the horse has all hooves on the ground, then the rider survived all battles uninjured and later died of natural causes.
This intriguing deduction has over the years been popularized by many a tourist guidebook, the most popular of which is the 1987 book Hands on Chicago written by Mark Frazel and Kenan Heise. A paragraph of this book says:
“At Sheridan Road and Belmont Avenue, the statue of [General] Sheridan beckons troops to battle. The horse General Sheridan rides is named Winchester…Winchester’s raised leg symbolizes his rider was wounded in battle (the legs of [General] Grant’s horse are on the ground, meaning he was not wounded).”
So is this idea, in all its glamour, just a myth? Or is it fact?
It should first be noted that the idea of a tradition of signaling the fates of riders in the hooves of their horses has been debunked by the U.S. Army Center for Military History. If the words alone of the historians of the U.S. Army are not enough, perhaps a walk through Washington D.C. would suffice to confirm what they say.
Washington D.C. is the city with the largest collection of equestrian statues in the world. Among this vast collection of horses and riders, only about 7 out of 29 that were analyzed have been found to conform to the myth.
Moreover, there are cases in which multiple statues of the same person are contradictory. Take General Philip H. Sheridan for example: an equestrian statue of General Sheridan in Washington D.C. depicts the horse to be standing on all four hooves. Two other statues in Chicago and New York show the horse to be raising one hoof.
Indeed, General Sheridan was wounded during the Civil War, but did not die in battle. So if the tradition holds true, the horse should have one hoof in the air, like the statues in New York and Chicago. But the one in Washington D.C. goes against the tradition.
Another notable statue in Washington D.C. is that of General Andrew Jackson, in Lafayette Park. This equestrian statue is the oldest statue in Washington D.C. The horse in this fine piece has both forelegs in the air. However, Jackson died of tuberculosis and heart failure, not in battle.
There have also been cases in which one sculptor made several equestrian statues without following the tradition. One such case involves the famous Irish sculptor Augustus Saint-Gaudens. Sometimes his statues follow the tradition, sometimes they don’t.
This suggests that the posture of the horses in each statue would merely be dependent on the choices and skills of the sculptors, and conformity with any supposed tradition could be dismissed as simple coincidence.
Perhaps a confirmation of the myth can be found in the equestrian statues erected in memory of the Battle of Gettysburg that took place during the American Civil War. If we consider only the statues that commemorate Gettysburg, the majority of them do conform to the tradition.
However, with even just one statue going against the tradition, claims of secret messages should be taken with a pinch of salt. And there is one Gettysburg statue that fails to adhere to the tradition: that of Lieutenant General James Longstreet. The highly controversial but talented Longstreet was not wounded at Gettysburg. However, the horse in his equestrian statue has one hoof in the air.
The same principle can also be said of equestrian statues in Europe in general: If such a tradition exists, there should be some widespread consistency to it. Some non-American examples of statues that ignore the tradition include those of Emperor Marcus Aurelius, Emperor Constantine, and King Louis XIV.
Aurelius’ statue has one hoof in the air, but there is no record of him ever being wounded in battle.
Constantine’s statue has his horse rampant—with both legs in the air. However, it is a well-known fact that he did not die in battle.
King Louis XIV also has a statue with his horse rampant. Contrary to what the equestrian statue tradition would say, King Louis XIV died of gangrene, and not in battle.
With all this, it is safe to say that the tradition does not hold up to scrutiny.
Admittedly, it would have been quite fascinating if such a tradition were proven to be true. However, because there is no strong proof of its credibility, it remains what it has always been: a myth.
There is absolutely zero common sense in this mandatory reporting bill.
How will this bill stop straw purchases?
Remember when “victim blaming” was a bad thing?
Supposedly it still is, but only on some things. It seems that teaching that a woman should be responsible for her safety is “blaming the victim” for not stopping a rape–even though no one is saying or even believing that–but it’s perfectly fine to try to penalize the victim for having their guns stolen.
A bill in Texas, of all places, seeks to criminalize people who have their guns stolen and don’t immediately report it to authorities.
A bill introduced this legislative session seeks to make it a crime to fail to report a lost or stolen gun to law enforcement authorities.
State Rep. Eddie Rodriguez said it’s a law that doesn’t exist and needs to be on the books.
“We know when guns are stolen or lost, a crime will be committed with that weapon,” he said.
House Bill 1207 would require a gun owner whose weapon is lost or stolen to report it to authorities within five days of first realizing the weapon is gone. Failure to do so would mean the person would face a Class C misdemeanor and the loss of their eligibility for a license to carry for five years.
Rodriguez thinks the law would cut back on “straw purchases,” which are a federal crime.
“The ‘straw purchase’ is me giving (a gun) to someone that really shouldn’t be allowed to have one,” Rodriguez said.
He thinks it’s a commonsense bill that should make it through the floor.
Rodriguez wouldn’t know common sense if it slapped him in the face.
First, let’s look at the problem. You’re supposed to report it within five days of noticing the gun is gone. Show of hands, how many of you take daily attendance of your firearms?
So how are prosecutors going to prove when I realized the gun was gone?
Second, prove it was still my gun. “Nope. Sold that one a year ago. Don’t remember who to.” This is Texas we’re talking about here. There aren’t universal background checks in place.
In other words, the only people who will be prosecuted by this are honest people. Sorry, but that doesn’t seem remotely right, especially since they’re a victim here.
Clearly, this is meant to try and combat all the canoe accidents gun owners are always talking about having.
Seriously, let’s talk about the straw purchase aspect of this for a moment, because that one may look to the outsider as legitimate. The problem is that few people go out and buy a gun through a straw buy, then use it right away and get caught. They get caught much later, at which point the straw buyers say, “Money got tight a month or so later, so I sold it.”
It’s too easy to beat, for one thing. For another, even if you close that avenue up, you’re not actually going to deprive criminals of guns. They’ll get it from somewhere else
“That’s not an argument against the law!” someone will say, and I get where they’re coming from. In and of itself, it’s not a valid argument.
But the problem is that it’s part of an overall argument that not only will it not stop the bad guys, but it’ll also hurt the good guys who have done nothing wrong.
This is nothing more than legislative victim blaming, and it needs to crash and burn.
So, Comrade Booker, can you name one place better to be born in today?
Is Cuba better? Is Venezuela better? Maybe North Korea?
Sen. Cory Booker (D., N.J.) questioned the veracity of the American Dream on Tuesday, saying the United States is not necessarily “the top country” to be born today.
Booker appeared on the “Pitchfork Economics” podcast with co-hosts Nick Hanauer and David Goldstein to discuss multiple issues, including the economy and poverty rates.
The senator contrasted the conditions in America today with those in the 1930s, a time known as “the Great Depression,” when his father was born.
“Even if you were a black guy like my dad and you were going to pick a country to be born in, the United States would be at the top of your list because we were expanding middle class at a rate that was creating opportunity,” Booker said.
Booker, who announced earlier this month he was running for president, went on to say that for those born on planet Earth today, the United States is not necessarily the best place to live because of one’s ability to get out of poverty.
“The United States of America is not gonna be, necessarily if you’re just looking to get out of poverty, that’s your only metric, this is not necessarily the top country if you’re going to be born poor to get out. And that’s actually an assault on the very idea of the American dream,” Booker said.
“I think we need to be the party of reclaiming the dream,” he continued. “We need to be the party of reimagining what this nation– to create great pathways of prosperity and this is just one of those bills that my team and I are sitting down and thinking, “Okay. How is this being rigged? How are the rules changed? How can we address those changes?'”
I am relieved that my drinks are not on the list Dragon OOlong tea and Pepsi with real sugar.
That’s quite the list. (Even ‘organic’ brands are affected.) Is YOUR brand on it?
Is this a case of ‘nothing to worry about’ or will this have you thinking about switching drinks?
A Glyphosate study on fifteen major brands of beer and five brands of wine turned up ‘trace amounts’ of the active ingredient in Roundup.
The study was done by an advocacy group — US PIRG — which tested positive for at least some level of Glyphosate for all but one of the brands tested.
No, it doesn’t mean we’re all going to look like that fish in the Simpsons anytime soon.
But it is still good to know a thing or two about what you’re drinking.
They include brands like Coors Light, Miller Lite, Budweiser, Corona, Heineken, Guinness, Stella Artois and Samuel Adams.
“The levels of glyphosate we found are not necessarily dangerous but are still concerning given the potential health risks,” U.S. PIRG said.
…The highest concentration of glyphosate was found in the 2018 Sutter Home merlot, which came in at 51.4 parts per billion, or ppb.
For beer, Tsingtao from Hong Kong had the most with 49.7ppb, and Coors Light had the most for American beers with 31.1ppb.
The study author, US PIRG Edication Fund’s Kara Cook-Schultz, said of the study: ‘No matter the efforts of brewers and vintners, we found that it is incredibly difficult to avoid the troubling reality that consumers will likely drink glyphosate at every happy hour and backyard barbecue around the country.’
A spokesperson for the Beer Institute, a national trade organization, responded to the report by telling USA: ‘Our members work with farmers who go to great lengths to raise their crops sustainably and safely….and the results of the most recent federal testing showed farmers’ use of glyphosate falls well below federal limits.’
It’s too bad there are no other options out there for someone who’d like a drink.
I have but one comment “Elections have consequences.”
Washington, D.C. – -(AmmoLand.com)- You can’t say that there was no warning. Last year, Ammoland discussed how our rights would be at risk with Jerrold Nadler as Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. At the time, I noted, “In terms of his voting record, Nadler is just as bad as Charles Schumer and Dianne Feinstein. There is one major difference – he has just been much more low-key, and as a result, he is under the radar.”
Well, Nadler is no longer under the radar, folks. Furthermore, he’s left no doubt that he is just as bad as Feinstein. Oh, he doesn’t have a “Mr. and Mrs. America” moment, but according to Cybercast News Service, he has embraced Australia as an example when it comes to firearms ownership. Which, for all intents and purposes, means he wants to confiscate your modern sporting rifles, your modern multi-purpose shotguns, and even your old pump-action shotguns that were handed down from your parents or other relatives.
But Australia-style goes beyond that. One has to show a “genuine purpose” to own a gun. And as is the case with the so-called discretionary-issue states (really no-issue states as a general rule), self-defense is often not considered a good reason to have a gun. Australia is the “needs-based” licensing system of Sarah Brady’s dreams. Oh, and you can forget concealed carry of any stripe, either. If self-defense is no longer a valid reason to own a gun… they why would they even think about letting you carry one?
And here is something that should wake a lot of people up: Jerrold Nadler thinks he can eventually pull it off. He’s thinking long-term, and he has a plan to get there. He knows that the current situation won’t let him get that Australia-type legislative package, but he can lay the groundwork to get it. In this, he has a far better grasp of strategy and tactics than many of those who deride the NRA as “Negotiating Rights Away” or who label Second Amendment supporters trying to effectively counter Nadler’s extreme anti-Second Amendment agenda as “Fudds.”
There were tons of close races for House seats this year… races that almost uniformly tipped against the most viable pro-Second Amendment candidates. How many of those who denounced the NRA or other Second Amendment supporters for insufficient purity empowered Nadler either through votes for third-party candidates or by sitting out the midterms? They didn’t defend the Second Amendment, they helped Bloomberg by putting Nadler in a position where he could go on offense.
But that offense is really not the big prize. Legislative and political battles are really holding actions for two to four years. The Supreme Court, while important, gives a longer respite of about two or three decades. The real battle is an ongoing one for the hearts and minds of our fellow Americans.
We won’t ever get Nadler, Chuck Schumer, or Dianne Feinstein to give up efforts to take away our rights over shootings we never committed. But that isn’t what we need to do. We can and must focus our efforts on convincing our fellow Americans that those anti-Second Amendment extremists are in the wrong to punish millions of law-abiding citizens who either wish to exercise their Second Amendment rights responsibly or who actually do exercise those rights for the actions of criminals and madmen.
This is a battle that cannot be won or lost with just a few pronouncements about the Second Amendment. No, this is an ongoing fight, and the right strategy and tactics, including coming across in the right way, will give us a better chance of having a more favorable political climate to win those hearts and minds.
Sen. Barrasso: ‘Green New Deal would bankrupt the nation’
The “Green New Deal” would cost up to $94.4 trillion, or over $600,000 per household in the United States, according to a new study.
The American Action Forum study offers a conservative estimate of the costs of providing every resident in the country a federal job with benefits, “adequate” housing, “healthy food,” and health care.
Though Democratic socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (D., N.Y.) plan is vague on specifics, it calls for the “economic transformation” of the United States, a complete overhaul of transportation systems, and retrofitting every single building. A supplemental document explaining the plan, since deleted from her website after it was widely mocked on social media, called for economic security for everyone, even those “unwilling to work,” the elimination of air travel, and “farting cows.”
However, the American Action Forum was able to calculate estimates for several items the plan does propose, including guaranteed green housing, universal health care, and food security. Estimates of specific goals identified in the Green New Deal would cost each household in America between $36,100 and $65,300 every year.
“The American Action Forum’s analysis shows that the Green New Deal would bankrupt the nation,” said Sen. John Barrasso (R., Wyo.), chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“On the upper end, every American household would have to pay $65,000 per year to foot the bill,” he said. “The total price tag would be $93 trillion over 10 years. That is roughly four times the value of all Fortune 500 companies combined. That’s no deal.”
Barrasso said the focus should be on innovation, rather than costly federal programs.
“Instead, we should promote innovation to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Promising new technologies like advanced nuclear power, carbon capture, and carbon utilization hold the key to significant emissions reductions,” he said. “We can lower our emissions without crashing our economy.”
The United States is already leading the world in carbon emissions reduction. The first year of the Trump administration emissions were reduced by 2.7 percent.
The American Action Forum calculated guaranteed green housing would cost between $1.6 trillion and $4.2 trillion; a federal jobs guarantee between $6.8 trillion and $44.6 trillion; a net zero emissions transportation system between $1.3 trillion and $2.7 trillion; a low-carbon electricity grid for $5.4 trillion; and “food security” for $1.5 billion.
Enough high-speed rail “to make air travel unnecessary,” would cost roughly $1.1 to $2.5 trillion. Universal Health Care, or a Medicare-for-all type plan, would cost $36 trillion over 10 years, totaling $260,000 per household in the United States.
Many of the figures are conservative estimates. For instance, researchers assumed obtaining a low-carbon electricity grid would require no new construction of transmission assets, when in actuality, such a grid would require new infrastructure.
“The Green New Deal is clearly very expensive,” the American Action Forum said. “Its further expansion of the federal government’s role in some of the most basic decisions of daily life, however, would likely have a more lasting and damaging impact than its enormous price tag.”
In all, the plan would cost between $52.6 trillion and $94.4 trillion, over 10 years. The burden to the taxpayer would amount to between $361,010 and $653,010 for each household over 10 years.
Electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket under such a plan. Barrasso’s office previously calculated the Green New Deal would increase electric bills by up to $3,800 per year.
Taking the lead of Ocasio-Cortez, who recently suggested people should stop reproducing because climate change will end the world in 12 years, Democratic 2020 hopefuls have lined up to endorse the Green New Deal.
Sen. Cory Booker (D., N.J.) has said the planet “simply can’t sustain” people eating meat, and compared the Green New Deal to landing on the moon and fighting World War II.
Sen. Kamala Harris (D., Calif.) called the Green New Deal “practical,” during an interview Sunday, adding “of course we can afford” the plan because climate change is “an existential threat to us.”
“It’s not about a cost,” Harris said. “It’s about an investment.”