Whoa: RBG Just Sided With Conservative Justices

H/T Town Hall.

Stop the presses Liberal Ruth Buzzi(Bader)Ginsburg side with Conservatives.

Lots of liberals are in tears.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, one of the four liberal justices on the Supreme Court, sided with her conservative colleagues on Monday over a prisoner’s supervisory release. She joinedJustices Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh in the majority, deciding that a criminal defendant, in this case Jason Mont, can be sentenced for violating his supervised release, even if the release expires while he is incarcerated ahead of facing new charges. Her vote was swapped with conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch, whojoined liberal Justices Sonia SotomayorStephen Breyer and Elena Kagan in their dissent.

Mont had been indicted by a grand jury for multiple drug and firearm offenses. He was released from federal prison on March 6, 2012, but broke the law again on supervised release, found guilty of two counts of cocaine trafficking. He then tested positive on several drug tests. His supervised release date was set for June  28, 2017.

The District  Court  issued  a  warrant  on  March  30,  2017,  and  ultimately  set  a  supervised-release  hearing  for  June  28, 2017. Two  days  before  that  hearing,  Mont  challenged  the jurisdiction of the District Court based on the fact that his supervised  release  had  initially  been  set  to  expire  on  March 6, 2017.  The court concluded that it had authority to  supervise  Mont,  revoked  his  supervised  release,  and ordered  him  to  serve  an  additional  42  months’  imprisonment  to  run  consecutive  to  his  state  sentence.

Justice Thomas delivered the Court’s opinion.

“Under our view, in contrast, time in pretrial  detention  constitutes  supervised  release  only  if the charges against  the  defendant  are  dismissed  or  the defendant is acquitted,” he wrote. “This ensures that the defendant is not  faulted  for  conduct he might not  have  committed, while  otherwise  giving  full effect  to  the  lawful judgment previously imposed on the defendant.”

Ginsburg’s surprise alliance with Thomas comes a week after her tense argument with him over Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. The Court decided against taking up the question of the Sex Selective and Disability Abortion Ban, which, as Justice Thomas described it, bans abortions in which “the mother is seeking the abortion solely because of the child’s race, sex, diagnosis of Down syndrome, disability, or related characteristics.” He penned a 20-page opinion on how they cannot avoid the issue forever, and that the abortion rights movement was starting to look a lot like eugenics.

“This case highlights the fact that abortion is an act rife with the potential for eugenic manipulation. From the beginning, birth control and abortion were promoted as means of effectuating eugenics,” he wrote. “Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger was particularly open about the fact that birth control could be used for eugenic purposes.”

A frustrated Ginsburg said that Thomas’s diatribe “displays more heat than light.” She reasoned that, “A woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother.'” 

Today they managed to find an issue on which they have common ground.

Advertisements

Author: deplorablesunite

I am a divorced father of two daughters. I am a Deplorable. The cat in my profile is my buddy Ronnie Whiskers

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s