Pollster: It’s Curious How Biden Underperformed Hillary Clinton In Every City…Except These Four.

H/T Town Hall.

How could Joe Pee Pads Biden under perform everywhere except four cities and still allegedly be the winner?

Until all the votes are counted and all the allegations of voter fraud are investigated, I think it’s too early to declare a winner in the 2020 race. You keep fighting. For now, the legal challenges are hitting snags in the courts. Still, President Trump should keep fighting to the end. We have dead people voting. We have allegations of ballots being illegally backdated. Everything should be looked at right now. 

 

Was this election stolen? Well, millions feel that way. The turnout numbers are odd in some states, like Wisconsin, which hit 89 percent. Now, is that figure impossible? No. Wall Street Journal’s Kimberley Strassel did the math, but it’s highly improbable given the turnout rates in the surrounding areas. It would require 900,000 people showing up for same-day registrations. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich was blunter last Sunday, when he said, “I think he would have to do a lot to convince Republicans that this is anything except a left-wing power grab, financed by people like George Soros, deeply laid in at the local level, and, frankly, I think that it is a corrupt, stolen election.” He was commenting on Biden’s call for unity. Yet, he also gave a hat-tip to someone we have written about here: Democracy Institute’s Patrick Basham.

“We believe these people are thieves, we believe the big city machines are corrupt,” the former House Speaker said. “Interestingly Patrick Basham, who’s the most accurate pollster, he’s British, wrote in a British newspaper…that this clearly was a stolen election, that it is impossible to imagine that Biden outran Obama in some of these states.”

Indeed, Basham quoted Joseph Stalin’s remarks about elections, where the Soviet dictator mentioned something about how it’s not important who votes but how they are counted, which appears to ring “eerily true” with this race. Basham has more in his piece in the Sunday Express, where he first highlighted how his data was again on the money regarding Democratic turnout, the shy Trump vote, and how the president’s law and order approach prevented catastrophic bleeding with suburban women voters. Suburban white women and urban black males were the shy Trump voters of this year. The president drew 10 million new supporters in 2020. He also took aim at the 2020 pollsters as a whole this cycle as well.

“If you count the ballot fraud, most pollsters clearly failed. If you don’t include the fraudulent ballots, most pollsters failed on a spectacular scale,” wrote Basham. Yet, here’s where things get fishy in the 2020 race which he mentions at the end of his column. He cites Richard Baris of Big Data Poll who noted something funny about Biden’s numbers in the cities, how it lagged behind Clinton’s numbers, but shot off to the moon in these four cities. Just take a look at the states in which these cities are located as well:

How curious that, as Baris notes, “Trump won the largest non-white vote share for a Republican presidential candidate in 60 years. Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton in every major metro area around the country, save for Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia.”

Robert Barnes, the foremost election analyst, observes in these “big cities in swing states run by Democrats…the vote even exceeded the number of registered voters.” 

Trump’s victories in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin were on target until, in the middle of the night, counting was arbitrarily halted. Miraculously, several hundred thousand votes – all for Biden – were mysteriously ‘found’; Trump’s real leads subsequently vanished.

The protracted, eventual outcome will determine the contemporary relevance of Stalin’s observation. No matter who wins, most pollsters already have lost their credibility and influence.

Trump is still very much in ‘Hail Mary’ territory regarding pulling this out, but it’s no longer about this election. It’s about the next one. If Democrats can get away with these shenanigans this year, do you think they’ll stop? 

I think you all know the answer to that question. You all know the kind of left-wing scum we’re dealing with here. 

Lindsey Graham Alleges 25,000 Suspicious Nursing Home Ballots Uncovered in Pennsylvania

H/T Western Journal.

How many of these 25,000 were cast only for Joe Pee Pads Biden?

I think I can say safely none were cast for President Trump.

 

New claims of potential voter fraud have emerged from Pennsylvania, according to Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina.

Graham appeared Monday night on Fox News’ “Hannity” and sniped at Democrats’ willingness to allow potential voter fraud to pass without investigation if it allows them to end up with Joe Biden in the White House.

“The law is a means to an end. If it doesn’t get you to where you want to go, you just ignore it,” Graham said, repeating what he termed as the Democratic philosophy.

“How many times do we have to see that when it comes to liberals and the Democratic machine, they want an outcome the law be damned.”

Graham said that there are new claims emerging from Pennsylvania that require a thorough investigation.

“I’ve got more information. We’re now finding potentially that 25,000 nursing home residents in different nursing homes requested mail-in ballots at the exact same time,” he said.

“You can’t ballot harvest in Pennsylvania,” Graham said. “What are the odds that 25,000 people in different locations of the same age group requested at the same time a ballot? Somebody is up to no good in these nursing homes.”

Graham said that justice demands all allegations be investigated, whether Democrats like the process or not.

“We don’t need their permission to look into these allegations. We owe it to those who voted for President Trump and the country at large to test this system. If we don’t deal with voting by mail in 2020, we will never win the White House again,” he said.

Graham said mass mail-in voting represents the biggest difference between the 2016 and 2020 elections, and Republicans need to bring order to the chaos that has been revealed.

“It is the wild, wild West at post offices and there are no rules and if we don’t come up with some rules pretty soon, we’re going to get killed in perpetuity in presidential campaigns,” he said.

Graham said with two runoff races coming up in January that could determine control of the Senate, getting to the bottom of any and every allegation of election misconduct is critical.

“Why do we want to run down every lead and count every vote? We’ve got two elections in Georgia that will decide the fate of the nation,” he said.

Incumbent GOP Sens. David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler of Georgia will each face a January runoff. With the Senate projected to be 50-48 Republican after all the Election Day votes are counted, those races will determine if the GOP keeps its majority, or if the Senate is split 50-50, giving the tie-breaking vote to the vice president.

Graham said the nation needs to thoroughly review mail-in voting.

CNN Panel Says Harris Could Be Democrat Nominee For President In 2024

H/T Conservative Brief.

If Biden wins after all of the court challenges are over I do not look for Kalama Knee Pads Harris to wait on 2024 to backstab Joe Pee Pads Biden.

I look for Knee Pads Harris to work behind the scenes to have Pee Pads removed under the 25th Amendment.

Many people believed it, many people speculated about it, but now even the media is saying they believe it will be the case that Sen. Kamala Harris will vie for the presidency.

CNN host Anderson Cooper and guest David Axelrod speculated that, due to President-elect Joe Biden’s age, Vice President-elect Harris will attempt to become president in 2024, Mediaite reported.

Less than 12 hours after their network declared former Vice President Joe Biden the winner of the 2020 presidential race, CNN’s Anderson Cooper and David Axelrod openly speculated about the possibility that he won’t run for reelection.

During CNN’s election coverage Saturday night, Cooper referenced the age gap between Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris. (Biden will be 78 when he takes the Oath of Office in January, while Harris is 56.), The CNN anchor then introduced the possibility that Biden’s age would limit his time as commander in chief.

“I mean her age, Joe Biden’s age, the potential that he may only serve one term,” Cooper said before Axlerod interrupted.

Axelrod, who was former President Obama’s campaign manager, said that Harris is in the best position to win the Democrat nomination in 2024, even after her abysmal performance in the 2020 Democratic primaries.

“This is a unique political situation,” he said. “Because never has a vice president entered office on the first day as the, kind of, presumed frontrunner for the nomination four years later. And because of the dynamic that we’ve been discussing here, because she is seen by many on the left of the party as sort of their person in the administration, the person who is going to bring different voices into the discussions, there’s also pressure associated with that. So it’s a really unique situation that she’s going to have to navigate.”

Cooper said that Harris is in a tough position because she has to keep her credibility with progressives as she works for a more moderate president in Biden.

“If she is thinking about the next step, if four years from now President-Elect Biden decided not to run, if she does not respond to the left of the party, that is going to harm her down the road. And yet, clearly if there is going to be a lot of compromises being done, there’s a lot of folks on the left of the party who are not going to be happy,” he said.

“She’s got to navigate through the primary,” Axelrod argued. “We’re getting way ahead of ourselves.”

You think? First of all, there are still expected to be court challenges to the win the media has declared for Biden, which it appears that the CNN personalities are ignoring.

There is also no reason to believe, right now, that Joe Biden would not seek to win another election, even at the age of 82.

But even if Biden survives the court challenges to his declared victory, there is every indication that he would govern in a more moderate fashion than Harris would want, and that many in the Democrat Party would want.

It could be an interesting Democrat primary in 2024

Report: Mitch McConnell To Thwart Potential Biden Admin’s Plans Force a Centrist Cabinet

H/T Western Journal.

Hopefully Mitch will keep the radicals out of Bidens cabinet.

This will be Joe Pee Pads Bidens worst nightmare.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell would use a GOP Senate majority to force Democrats to refrain from choosing radical Cabinet appointees in the event of a potential Joe Biden presidency, according to a report.

While the presidential election results have not been declared as of Thursday morning, Biden’s campaign has set up a transition website, and a number establishment media outlets seem prepared to declare the Democrat as Tuesday’s winner.

Axios reported that should Biden win, McConnell intents to “wreak havoc” on his transition plans.

Noting that Republicans appear primed to retain Senate control no matter which way the presidential race goes, Axios reported people close to the Biden campaign are making transition plans with McConnell in mind.

Biden’s transition team is being forced to “consider limiting its prospective Cabinet nominees to those who Mitch McConnell can live with,” the outlet reported, citing unnamed sources.

 

According to the report, McConnell’s expected opposition to radical Cabinet appointees could rule out former National Security Advisor Susan Rice, former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates and failed 2018 Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams in the event Democrats win the White House.

“A source close to McConnell tells Axios a Republican Senate would work with Biden on centrist nominees but no ‘radical progressives’ or ones who are controversial with conservatives,” Axios reported. “The Biden agenda would be severely restricted by GOP control, the source added: ‘It’s going to be armed camps.’”

The outlet concluded that the dynamics of a split government could ultimately force Biden to take a centrist approach to his Cabinet picks should he win the election.

There is also speculation that such a scenario would give Biden an excuse not to give high-level jobs to far-left Democratic senators such as Sens. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts.

Former Deputy Secretary of State Tony Blinken was linked by Axios to a potential State Department vacancy, while Federal Reserve Board of Governors member Lael Brainard was linked to a potential Treasury Department vacancy.

The Washington Post reported that Democrats had signaled they intended to come away from Tuesday’s election with complete control over the federal government.

But with the Senate likely to remain in GOP hands and with Democrats shedding House seats, they will be forced to let go of any dreams of major government reforms.

The Post noted any plans for packing the Supreme Court and ending the Senate filibuster will have to be shelved.

Democrats might also have to curtail plans to bolster the Affordable Care Act, pass a massive coronavirus spending bill and climate change legislation, and eliminate GOP tax reforms.

Of course, if President Donald Trump comes away from the hotly contested election victorious, Democrats will be have a slimmer House majority and will remain a minority opposition party.

Report: Mitch McConnell To Thwart Potential Biden Admin’s Plans Force a Centrist Cabinet

H/T Western Journal.

This is the plus side of Senator Mitch McConnell running the Senate.

This is Joe Pee Pads Biden’s nightmare.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell would use a GOP Senate majority to force Democrats to refrain from choosing radical Cabinet appointees in the event of a potential Joe Biden presidency, according to a report.

While the presidential election results have not been declared as of Thursday morning, Biden’s campaign has set up a transition website, and a number establishment media outlets seem prepared to declare the Democrat as Tuesday’s winner.

Axios reported that should Biden win, McConnell intents to “wreak havoc” on his transition plans.

Noting that Republicans appear primed to retain Senate control no matter which way the presidential race goes, Axios reported people close to the Biden campaign are making transition plans with McConnell in mind.

Biden’s transition team is being forced to “consider limiting its prospective Cabinet nominees to those who Mitch McConnell can live with,” the outlet reported, citing unnamed sources.

 

According to the report, McConnell’s expected opposition to radical Cabinet appointees could rule out former National Security Advisor Susan Rice, former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates and failed 2018 Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams in the event Democrats win the White House.

“A source close to McConnell tells Axios a Republican Senate would work with Biden on centrist nominees but no ‘radical progressives’ or ones who are controversial with conservatives,” Axios reported. “The Biden agenda would be severely restricted by GOP control, the source added: ‘It’s going to be armed camps.’”

The outlet concluded that the dynamics of a split government could ultimately force Biden to take a centrist approach to his Cabinet picks should he win the election.

There is also speculation that such a scenario would give Biden an excuse not to give high-level jobs to far-left Democratic senators such as Sens. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts.

Former Deputy Secretary of State Tony Blinken was linked by Axios to a potential State Department vacancy, while Federal Reserve Board of Governors member Lael Brainard was linked to a potential Treasury Department vacancy.

The Washington Post reported that Democrats had signaled they intended to come away from Tuesday’s election with complete control over the federal government.

But with the Senate likely to remain in GOP hands and with Democrats shedding House seats, they will be forced to let go of any dreams of major government reforms.

The Post noted any plans for packing the Supreme Court and ending the Senate filibuster will have to be shelved.

 

Democrats might also have to curtail plans to bolster the Affordable Care Act, pass a massive coronavirus spending bill and climate change legislation, and eliminate GOP tax reforms.

Of course, if President Donald Trump comes away from the hotly contested election victorious, Democrats will be have a slimmer House majority and will remain a minority opposition party.

Report: Mail-in Ballot Count ‘Halted’ in Philadelphia as Democrats Challenge Court Order Allowing GOP Observers

H/T Breitbart.

This should give President Trump grounds to challenge Pennsylvania being called for Joe Pee Pads Biden.

Officials “halted” mail-in ballot counting in Philadelphia following a court order allowing GOP observers to watch the vote count — a ruling that Democrats are now looking to challenge.

Philadelphia paused the count around noon Eastern on Thursday after Democrats took an issue with a court ruling allowing Republican watchers to stand six feet from those counting the ballots. Two Democrat officials told NBC that Democrats are taking their complaint to the state’s Supreme Court:

 

 

A spokesperson for the state’s high court quickly quashed the rumor that it had overruled the lower ruling. While the spokesperson denied that a filing had been made, minutes later, they said a filing had been made:

 

“The crooked and thieving Democrats in Philly oppose having lawful observers watch ballots being counted,” Trump campaign senior adviser Jason Miller said, questioning why Democrats would “oppose basic transparency”:

 

Earlier, Miller announced the “massive legal victory,” delivered by Judge Christine Fizzano Cannon.

Per the ruling, “all candidates, watchers, or candidate representatives be permitted to be present for the canvassing process … and be permitted to observe all aspects of the canvassing process within 6 feet, while adhering to all COVID-19 protocols, including, wearing masks and maintaining social distancing”:

 

Trump held a 116,000 as of noon Eastern, but the Biden campaign believes he will secure a victory in the Keystone State due to his advantage with mail-in ballots.

Latest Vote Totals Show New Leader in Two Crucial States

H/T Western Journal.

I have my doubts on how legitimate this so called win for Joe Pee Pads Biden really is.

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden took the lead in Georgia and Pennsylvania early Friday morning, overtaking President Donald Trump in the two battleground states.

Biden currently leads Trump in Georgia by less than 1 percent of the votes, The New York Times reported.

As of Friday morning, Biden has received 2,449,590 votes in the Peach State while Trump has received 2,448,492 votes.

The lead initially came from Clayton County in the Atlanta suburbs, according to The Hill.

Biden has received 52.3 percent of absentee votes and Trump has received 46.7 percent.

Democrats have not carried a presidential election in the state since 1992.

Biden also overtook Trump in Pennsylvania by 1 percent of the votes, The New York Times reported.

As of Friday morning, Biden has received 3,297,614 votes in the Keystone State while Trump has received 3,290,788 votes.

Many of these votes came from mail-in ballots that are still being counted. Biden has received 79.6 percent of absentee votes.

If Biden wins Pennsylvania and its 20 electoral votes, he will have more than the 270 electoral votes needed to win the White House.

Votes are still being tallied and no networks have called the race in either state as of the publication of this article.

Biden also retains a lead in the states of Nevada and Arizona.

If he were to win Georgia, Pennsylvania, Nevada and Arizona, he would end with 306 electoral votes.

Trump blamed Democrats, local officials, pollsters and the media for shrinking his lead in the past few days, The Hill reported.

“If you count the legal votes, I easily win. If you count the illegal votes, they can try to steal the election from us,” he told reporters Thursday evening.

“If you count the votes that came in late, we’re looking at them very strongly.”

There has been no evidence of voter fraud at this time but the Trump campaign is pursuing multiple lawsuits in battleground states, according to ABC News.

Republicans have condemned Trump’s statements and have asked the president to “stop spreading debunked misinformation.”

“We want every vote counted, yes every legal vote, of course,” Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois tweeted.

“But, if you have legit concerns about fraud, present evidence and take it to court. Stop spreading debunked misinformation … this is getting insane.”

Winners and Losers of The 2020 Election (So Far)

H/T The Washington Free Beacon.

Hopefully we can add Joe Pee Pads Biden and Kamala Knee Pads Harris to the losers column.

Election Day finally happened on Tuesday, but as of Wednesday most of the key races remained too close to call. The lack of clarity, however, does not preclude an advanced analysis of the partial results. Even with many votes left to be counted, the election has already produced a number of clear winners and pathetic losers. Scroll down to learn more.

BIGGEST WINNERS

1) Donald Trump

The biggest winner of Election Night, by far. If he wins, he’ll Make American Great Again, Again. If he loses, he will have already accomplished his goal of becoming the most famous person on Earth, as well as president of the United States. He will have achieved an unprecedented level of success in just a single term in office and will go down in history as one of the most illustrious leaders of the modern era. Plus, he’s still the frontrunner in 2024. Either way, mission accomplished!

2) Mitch McConnell

Just days after quarterbacking the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the Senate majority leader dominated his Democratic challenger, Amy McGrath, who raised tens of millions of dollars from liberal donors who apparently hate money almost as much as they hate Mitch McConnell. Regardless of who wins the presidency, it is now increasingly likely that Republicans will retain control of the Senate, where McConnell’s benevolent reign of terror can proceed apace.

3) Racial Diversity

Millions of Hispanics were instantly reclassified as “white,” mostly by aggrieved libs, after it became clear that Trump would increase his share of the Hispanic vote significantly compared with 2016. The president also managed to win a larger percentage of the non-white vote than any Republican candidate since 1960. That’s great news for Americans who value racial diversity but bad news for the “woke” libs who favor racial division. Barack Obama promised to promote racial harmony; Trump has actually done it.

4) Law and Order

 

At least in the short term. Trump’s failure to secure a decisive win on Election Night means that Antifa thugs have temporarily postponed their plans to desecrate America’s cities in “protest” against his reelection. That’s a good thing. Trump could still win, so it’s probably best to keep those storefronts boarded up a little longer just to be safe.

UpdateNever mind.

5) Hillary Clinton

Joe Biden couldn’t deliver an overwhelming victory—as foretold by the “experts.” He could still lose. That’s great news for Hillary Clinton, whose 2016 loss to Trump was assessed by many to be the result of her unique deficiencies as a candidate and as a human being. The 2020 results suggest perhaps the Democratic Party’s unique deficiencies as a political organization are to blame. Congrats!

BIGGEST LOSERS

1) The Libs

They are going to be so owned if Trump wins. Even if he doesn’t, this was not the overwhelming repudiation they would have liked. If Republicans hold the Senate, that means at least two more years of Mitch McConnell confirming judges on the reg, and absolutely no chance of any radical structural reforms being enacted.

2) The Experts

The polling in 2016 was way off. In an effort to correct those mistakes, professional pollsters ruthlessly scrutinized their methodologies and made the necessary changes. That’s what they told us, anyway. At this point, we should consider the possibility that these so-called “experts” really have no idea what they’re doing. This year’s polls were even less accurate than in 2016. Congrats!

3) Lincoln Project Donors

They gave millions of dollars to a bunch of ex-GOP grifters who wooed them with their “edgy” ad campaigns, and promised to make a difference by taking down Trump’s “enablers” in the Senate. The grifters are laughing all the way to the bank, while Mitch McConnell, Joni Ernst, Susan Collins, Lindsey Graham, and (probably) Thom Tillis are laughing all the way to the Senate.

4) Court Packers

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. See winner #2.

5) Race Hucksters

See winner #3 above. Trump’s growing support among minority voters ought to raise serious questions about whether the Democratic Party’s race-obsessed “woke” rhetoric is little more than a masturbatory dog whistle for educated white liberals. Using the word “Latinx,” which most actual Hispanics have never heard, might impress the New York Times editorial board, but it doesn’t bring voters to the polls.

 

AZ Gun Store Owner: Biden Will Crush Our Business Erase Our Freedom

H/T Breitbart.

Joe Pee Pads Biden and Kalama Knee Pads Harris will be the worst thing that could happen to gun owners,gun shop owners and the Second Amendment.

An Arizona gun store owner told Breitbart News that Joe Biden’s gun control proposals would crush small gun retailers and erase the Second Amendment freedoms Arizonans cherish and enjoy.

We talked with George Urmston, owner of Phoenix, Arizona’s Cave Creek Guns, and focused on Biden’s proposed taxes of $200 on AR-15 riflesand on any other rifle deemed an “assault weapon” by Democrats, as well as the $200 tax Biden is proposing for “high capacity” magazines.

What would these taxes mean for Arizona gun owners?

What would they mean for Arizona’s gun-friendly culture?

Urmston said first off, those taxes would make it impossible for small businesses like his to do business. He continued:

People are already paying an elevated price for guns and accessories, due to basic supply and demand. The demand for guns right now is through the roof and the supply is not sufficient to keep up with demand. So people are sometimes paying an astronomical price just to get the peace of mind the Second Amendment provides. Add a $200 tax to a rifle already in high demand and that would put an immediate damper on business.

He then stressed Biden’s proposed gun and magazine taxes, together with other proposed Biden controls, including a one-gun-a-month firearm purchase limit, universal background checks, and revived Social Security gun ban, would “erase Arizonans’ Second Amendment freedom.”

Urmston sounded the alarm along with a call to action, predicting those gun controls would erase Second Amendment rights. He added:

[It] would erase our freedoms and liberties, from the inside. Biden and his administration would hit us where it hurts, would constrict our ability to produce and supply Americans the freedom that they are allowed. And this is not like past elections, these people are getting smart. They are literally focusing their energies on taking away our freedom.

Urmston said 30 percent of gun purchases at his store this year have been made by first-time buyers.

And he draws confidence from those new gun owners, noting how gun ownership could transform voting habits and bring new gun voters to the polls next week.

 

He said, “As far as Arizona goes, we have this mass influx of people from California. They are coming here and they continue to vote the way they did to ruin their state. But what can change that is the fact that we have so many first time gun buyers flooding into our store. And when they come in, concerned over civil unrest, you can see this fear in their eyes. You see this look, like they’re fully exposed. So we not only sell them a gun, but we would send them with firearms instruction and information on instructors. They would come into the store a few weeks later and they exuded a confidence that you cannot believe, and that was from the peace of mind that they got from being able to protect their families.”

Urmston stressed purchasing and becoming comfortable with a firearm “changed the way they will live their lives,” and in many cases, the way they will vote.

 

 

Heroes Who Took On Church Shooters Now Take On Biden

H/T Bearing Arms.

Jack Wilson and Stephen Willeford speak out against Joe Pee Pads Biden and his radical anti-gun views.

While there are still people who are trying to claim that Joe Biden won’t take away our guns, they’re generally people who don’t know what the hell they’re talking about.

Biden is part of a large number of Americans who live in the deluded belief that firearms don’t make us any safer, that gun control is the only thing that can stop something like a mass shooting.

 

Meanwhile, two actual individuals who have stopped mass shootings have decided to step up and offer their take on Biden’s policies.

Before we get too deep on this, though, I should mention that Stephen Williford will be on Cam & Company this Friday, so be sure to check that out.

Both of these men have stopped church shootings in Texas. Jack Wilson engaged the Sutherland Springs shooter after he exited the church, eventually pursuing the killer. Williford is known for putting down the attempted mass shooter at a church in White Settlement, TX.

These are the “good guys with guns” we tell you about, yet Joe Biden says guys like this simply don’t exist.

To that, Willeford asks, “If it was Hunter Biden and your wife and family sitting in those pews at that church, would you still not want me to have this gun to protect them with?”

Of course, we all know the answer, though I doubt Biden will provide it.

“I put a terrorist down in a matter of seconds with this gun, and it’s not even a weapon of war or whatever that means,” Williford added. “You know what Joe told me? That I shouldn’t have been armed in that church.”

And it’s not just Biden. There are a lot of people who are pushing policies that would have seen Willeford disarmed. Their policies would have resulted in a lot of people dying.

Oh, some would argue that he wouldn’t need that gun if people couldn’t bring firearms into a church, but that’s just insane thinking. Unless a church is going to make everyone walk through metal detectors prior to taking a seat in the pews, there’s literally no way to stop it. Laws against guns in church will stop a mass shooter about as well as laws against murder have.

Wilson noted, “I am very sad in the loss of two dear friends and brothers in Christ, but evil does exist in this world and I and other members are not going to allow evil to succeed.”

Frankly, that’s how a lot of us feel. Evil exists. There’s no way around that. There’s no pie-in-the-sky policy that will make it go away, either. All you can do is prepare yourself should you be unfortunate enough to come face to face with it.

Jack Wilson and Stephen Williford did. They looked evil right in the eye and went to war with it.

As Edmund Burke noted, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” These two men didn’t stand by and let evil triumph. They did something.

Now, Joe Biden wants to make it so they can’t do anything ever again.